2017
Taking Stories Seriously: Richard Rorty and Human Rights
HAPLA, MartinZákladní údaje
Originální název
Taking Stories Seriously: Richard Rorty and Human Rights
Autoři
Vydání
1st edition. Brno, Argumentation 2017. International Conference on Alternative Methods of Argumentation in Law, od s. 39-50, 12 s. 2017
Nakladatel
Masaryk university
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
50501 Law
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/17:00099506
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
ISBN
978-80-210-8839-9
UT WoS
Klíčová slova česky
Rorty; Human Rights; Legal Theory; Stories.
Klíčová slova anglicky
Rorty; lidská práva; právní teorie; příběhy.
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 5. 2018 13:46, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Anotace
V originále
This paper deals with the influence of stories on our approach to human rights. In this context, it analyses the philosophy of Richard Rorty whose name is associated with the most important attempt in this respect. This philosopher refuses to seek the foundation of human rights but instead emphasizes the development of the human rights culture. In his view, the way to develop this culture is hidden in sentimental education. It consists of telling sentimental stories to influence our approach to human rights. The paper summarizes the critique of this concept. The problem is that the success of sentimental education implies that people share the ability to feel pain and have a good degree of empathy. The meaning of norms is then that they are available in situations where our degree of empathy is insufficient or completely missing. It therefore appears that this concept can only work within a very narrow framework. For these and other reasons, Rorty is highly criticized in a philosophical context. The author of the paper, however, raises the question if such context is appropriate for understanding Rorty’s work. Rorty himself categorizes philosophy into systematic and edifying. Both have different goals, while the latter allows a more lenient assessment of his ideas. And it is this category that we should classify Rorty in. The final part of the paper is devoted to a general reflection on the role that stories can play in our human rights acceptance. Different forms of storytelling are undoubtedly an important part of our lives. However, it is not appropriate to absolutize them. They can be an interesting addition, but not the core of human rights theories.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/0828/2016, interní kód MU |
|