D 2017

Taking Stories Seriously: Richard Rorty and Human Rights

HAPLA, Martin

Základní údaje

Originální název

Taking Stories Seriously: Richard Rorty and Human Rights

Autoři

Vydání

1st edition. Brno, Argumentation 2017. International Conference on Alternative Methods of Argumentation in Law, od s. 39-50, 12 s. 2017

Nakladatel

Masaryk university

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/17:00099506

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISBN

978-80-210-8839-9

Klíčová slova česky

Rorty; Human Rights; Legal Theory; Stories.

Klíčová slova anglicky

Rorty; lidská práva; právní teorie; příběhy.

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 5. 2018 13:46, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

This paper deals with the influence of stories on our approach to human rights. In this context, it analyses the philosophy of Richard Rorty whose name is associated with the most important attempt in this respect. This philosopher refuses to seek the foundation of human rights but instead emphasizes the development of the human rights culture. In his view, the way to develop this culture is hidden in sentimental education. It consists of telling sentimental stories to influence our approach to human rights. The paper summarizes the critique of this concept. The problem is that the success of sentimental education implies that people share the ability to feel pain and have a good degree of empathy. The meaning of norms is then that they are available in situations where our degree of empathy is insufficient or completely missing. It therefore appears that this concept can only work within a very narrow framework. For these and other reasons, Rorty is highly criticized in a philosophical context. The author of the paper, however, raises the question if such context is appropriate for understanding Rorty’s work. Rorty himself categorizes philosophy into systematic and edifying. Both have different goals, while the latter allows a more lenient assessment of his ideas. And it is this category that we should classify Rorty in. The final part of the paper is devoted to a general reflection on the role that stories can play in our human rights acceptance. Different forms of storytelling are undoubtedly an important part of our lives. However, it is not appropriate to absolutize them. They can be an interesting addition, but not the core of human rights theories.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0828/2016, interní kód MU
Název: Axiologické základy právního myšlení (Akronym: HODNOTY)
Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Axiologické základy právního myšlení, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Přiložené soubory

Argumentation_2017.pdf
Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru