Adolescents’ multiple versus single primary attachment figures,
reorganization of attachment hierarchy, and adjustments : the
important people interview approach

J 2018

Adolescents’ multiple versus single primary attachment figures, reorganization of attachment hierarchy, and adjustments : the important people interview approach

UMEMURA, Tomotaka; Lenka LACINOVÁ; Jakub KRAUS; Eliška HORSKÁ; Lenka PIVODOVÁ et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Adolescents’ multiple versus single primary attachment figures, reorganization of attachment hierarchy, and adjustments : the important people interview approach

Autoři

UMEMURA, Tomotaka; Lenka LACINOVÁ ; Jakub KRAUS; Eliška HORSKÁ a Lenka PIVODOVÁ

Vydání

Attachment & Human Development, Routledge, Abingdon, 2018, 1461-6734

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50101 Psychology

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

článek v databázi Taylor & Francis

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.215

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/18:00100908

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

Adolescence; attachment hierarchy; internalizing and externalizing problems; multiple-informant approach; positive and negative affect schedule

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 13. 3. 2019 15:06, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

Using 212 adolescents from a central-European country (mean age = 14.02, SD = 2.05, ranged from 11 to 18 years; females = 54%) and a multi-informant method to measure adolescents’ behavioral and emotional adjustments, the present study explored three aspects regarding the attachment hierarchy. (1) The three types of behavioral systems of Rosenthal and Kobak’s important people interview (IPI) were initially validated using an exploratory factor analysis with a US sample. Using a confirmatory factor analysis with a Czech sample, we replicated these three behavioral systems: attachment bond, support seeking, and affiliation. (2) We found that adolescents who developed attachment bond to multiple primary attachment figures were likely to score lower on both teacher-rated and parent-rated internalizing problems compared to those who had a single primary attachment figure. These multiple primary attachment figures tended to be family members (not peers). (3) Early adolescents who placed parents low in their attachment hierarchy scored higher on self-reported negative affect and lower on self-reported positive affect compared to early adolescents who placed parents high. The present study highlights multiple (vs. single) primary attachment figures as a protective factor and the premature reorganization of attachment hierarchy as a risk factor for adolescents’ emotional and affective adjustments.

Návaznosti

GA16-03059S, projekt VaV

Název: Vývoj vztahů v adolescenci: Využití perspektivy citové vazby, dynamicko-systémového přístupu a metody časových řad (Akronym: VVvA)

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Vývoj vztahů v adolescenci: Využití perspektivy citové vazby, dynamicko-systémového přístupu a metody časových řad

Přiložené soubory

Adolescents_multiple_versus_single_primary_attachment_figures_reorganization_of_attachment_hierarchy_and_adjustments.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

UMEMURA, Tomotaka; Lenka LACINOVÁ; Jakub KRAUS; Eliška HORSKÁ a Lenka PIVODOVÁ. Adolescents’ multiple versus single primary attachment figures, reorganization of attachment hierarchy, and adjustments : the important people interview approach. Attachment & Human Development. Routledge: Abingdon, 2018, roč. 20, č. 5, s. 532-552. ISSN 1461-6734. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1464040.

@article{1414619,
   author = {Umemura, Tomotaka and Lacinová, Lenka and Kraus, Jakub and Horská, Eliška and Pivodová, Lenka},
   article_location = {Routledge},
   article_number = {5},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1464040},
   keywords = {Adolescence; attachment hierarchy; internalizing and externalizing problems; multiple-informant approach; positive and negative affect schedule},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1461-6734},
   journal = {Attachment & Human Development},
   title = {Adolescents’ multiple versus single primary attachment figures, reorganization of attachment hierarchy, and adjustments : the important people interview approach},
   url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616734.2018.1464040},
   volume = {20},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1414619
AU  - Umemura, Tomotaka - Lacinová, Lenka - Kraus, Jakub - Horská, Eliška - Pivodová, Lenka
PY  - 2018
TI  - Adolescents’ multiple versus single primary attachment figures, reorganization of attachment hierarchy, and adjustments : the important people interview approach
JF  - Attachment & Human Development
VL  - 20
IS  - 5
SP  - 532-552
EP  - 532-552
PB  - Abingdon
SN  - 14616734
KW  - Adolescence
KW  - attachment hierarchy
KW  - internalizing and externalizing problems
KW  - multiple-informant approach
KW  - positive and negative affect schedule
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616734.2018.1464040
L2  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616734.2018.1464040
N2  - Using 212 adolescents from a central-European country (mean age = 14.02, SD = 2.05, ranged from 11 to 18 years; females = 54%) and a multi-informant method to measure adolescents’ behavioral and emotional adjustments, the present study explored three aspects regarding the attachment hierarchy. (1) The three types of behavioral systems of Rosenthal and Kobak’s important people interview (IPI) were initially validated using an exploratory factor analysis with a US sample. Using a confirmatory factor analysis with a Czech sample, we replicated these three behavioral systems: attachment bond, support seeking, and affiliation. (2) We found that adolescents who developed attachment bond to multiple primary attachment figures were likely to score lower on both teacher-rated and parent-rated internalizing problems compared to those who had a single primary attachment figure. These multiple primary attachment figures tended to be family members (not peers). (3) Early adolescents who placed parents low in their attachment hierarchy scored higher on self-reported negative affect and lower on self-reported positive affect compared to early adolescents who placed parents high. The present study highlights multiple (vs. single) primary attachment figures as a protective factor and the premature reorganization of attachment hierarchy as a risk factor for adolescents’ emotional and affective adjustments.
ER  -

UMEMURA, Tomotaka; Lenka LACINOVÁ; Jakub KRAUS; Eliška HORSKÁ a Lenka PIVODOVÁ. Adolescents’ multiple versus single primary attachment figures, reorganization of attachment hierarchy, and adjustments : the important people interview approach. \textit{Attachment \&{} Human Development}. Routledge: Abingdon, 2018, roč.~20, č.~5, s.~532-552. ISSN~1461-6734. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1464040.

Přehled o publikaci