J 2018

SLN biopsy in cervical cancer patients with tumors larger than 2 cm and 4 cm

DOSTALEK, L., M. ZIKAN, D. FISCHEROVA, R. KOCIAN, A. GERMANOVA et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

SLN biopsy in cervical cancer patients with tumors larger than 2 cm and 4 cm

Autoři

DOSTALEK, L. (203 Česká republika), M. ZIKAN (203 Česká republika), D. FISCHEROVA (203 Česká republika), R. KOCIAN (203 Česká republika), A. GERMANOVA (203 Česká republika), F. FRUHAUF (203 Česká republika), Ladislav DUŠEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), J. SLAMA (203 Česká republika), P. DUNDR (203 Česká republika), K. NEMEJCOVA (203 Česká republika) a D. CIBULA (203 Česká republika, garant)

Vydání

Gynecologic Oncology, SAN DIEGO, ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2018, 0090-8258

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.393

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/18:00102807

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000428005300005

Klíčová slova anglicky

Cervical cancer; Bulky; Sentinel lymph node; False negative rate; Detection rate; Sensitivity

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 10. 2. 2019 19:41, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the detection rate, false-negative rate and sensitivity of SLN in LN staging in tumors over 2 cm on a large cohort of patients. Methods. Data from patients with stages pT1a - pT2 cervical cancer who underwent surgical treatment, including SLN biopsy followed by systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, were retrospectively analyzed. A combined technique with blue dye and radiocolloid was modified in larger tumors to inject the tracer into the residual cervical stroma. Results. The study included 350 patients with stages pTla - pT2. Macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells were found in 10%, 8%, and 4% of cases. Bilateral detection rate was similar in subgroups with tumors < 2 cm, 2-3.9 cm, and >= 4 cm (79%, 83%, 76%) (P = 0.460). There were only two cases with false-negative SLN ultrastaging for pelvic IN status among those with bilateral SLN detection. The false negative rate was very low in all three subgroups of different tumor sizes (0.9%, 0.9%, and 0.0%; P = 0.999). Sensitivity reached 96% in the whole group and was high in all three groups (93%, 93%, 100%; P = 0.510). Conclusions. If the tracer application technique is adjusted in larger tumors, SIN biopsy can be equally reliable in pelvic IN staging in tumors smaller and larger than 2 cm. The bilateral detection rate and false negative rate did not differ in subgroups of patients with tumors < 2 cm, 2-3.9 cm, and cm.