2018
Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study
SAUSSINE, C., S. ANDONIAN, Dalibor PACÍK, M. POPIOLEK, A. CELIA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study
Autoři
SAUSSINE, C. (250 Francie), S. ANDONIAN (124 Kanada), Dalibor PACÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), M. POPIOLEK (752 Švédsko), A. CELIA (380 Itálie), N. BUCHHOLZ (784 Spojené arabské emiráty), P. SOUNTOULIDES (300 Řecko), B. PETRUT (642 Rumunsko) a Jean J.M.C.H. DE LA ROSETTE (528 Nizozemské království, garant)
Vydání
Journal of endourology. New York, Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 2018, 0892-7790
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30217 Urology and nephrology
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.267
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00102913
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000422642200001
Klíčová slova anglicky
antiretropulsion; migration; ureteroscopy; stone cone; Ntrap; basket
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 2. 2019 16:03, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: Retropulsion, defined as unintended migration of a stone under the influence of the fragmentation device in ureteroscopy (URS) procedures, occurs in 2% to 60% of the cases. Antiretropulsive devices (ARDs) have been studied in experimental and small clinical studies. The current study aims at describing the worldwide usage of ARD and the outcomes related to their usage. Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society URS Global Study enrolled 11,885 patients who underwent URS and stone fragmentation for ureteral and/or renal stones. Of the 11,885 treated patients, 9877 were treated for ureteral stones, and data were available on stone migration and ARD use. Results: Of all procedures, 14.5% were performed with the use of an ARD. Less stone migration (-2.0%; p=0.050), higher stone-free rates (SFRs) (2.8%; p<0.001), and shorter length of stay (-4.7%; p=0.001) were observed in the antiretropulsive group. Conclusions: When an ARD is used during URS, less migration, higher SFRs, and shorter length of hospital stay are observed. This effect is independent from baseline differences and corrected for other treatment characteristics.