J 2018

Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study

SAUSSINE, C., S. ANDONIAN, Dalibor PACÍK, M. POPIOLEK, A. CELIA et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study

Autoři

SAUSSINE, C. (250 Francie), S. ANDONIAN (124 Kanada), Dalibor PACÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), M. POPIOLEK (752 Švédsko), A. CELIA (380 Itálie), N. BUCHHOLZ (784 Spojené arabské emiráty), P. SOUNTOULIDES (300 Řecko), B. PETRUT (642 Rumunsko) a Jean J.M.C.H. DE LA ROSETTE (528 Nizozemské království, garant)

Vydání

Journal of endourology. New York, Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 2018, 0892-7790

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30217 Urology and nephrology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.267

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/18:00102913

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000422642200001

Klíčová slova anglicky

antiretropulsion; migration; ureteroscopy; stone cone; Ntrap; basket

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 2. 2019 16:03, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Introduction: Retropulsion, defined as unintended migration of a stone under the influence of the fragmentation device in ureteroscopy (URS) procedures, occurs in 2% to 60% of the cases. Antiretropulsive devices (ARDs) have been studied in experimental and small clinical studies. The current study aims at describing the worldwide usage of ARD and the outcomes related to their usage. Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society URS Global Study enrolled 11,885 patients who underwent URS and stone fragmentation for ureteral and/or renal stones. Of the 11,885 treated patients, 9877 were treated for ureteral stones, and data were available on stone migration and ARD use. Results: Of all procedures, 14.5% were performed with the use of an ARD. Less stone migration (-2.0%; p=0.050), higher stone-free rates (SFRs) (2.8%; p<0.001), and shorter length of stay (-4.7%; p=0.001) were observed in the antiretropulsive group. Conclusions: When an ARD is used during URS, less migration, higher SFRs, and shorter length of hospital stay are observed. This effect is independent from baseline differences and corrected for other treatment characteristics.