New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation  to the
Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions

J 2018

New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions

SKULOVÁ, Soňa a Radislav BRAŽINA

Základní údaje

Originální název

New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions

Autoři

SKULOVÁ, Soňa (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Radislav BRAŽINA (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Central European Public Administration Review, Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, 2018, 2591-2240

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Slovinsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access časopisu

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/18:00100983

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2018.1.9

UT WoS

000461519400009

Klíčová slova anglicky

right to be heard; administrative offences; administrative offences proceedings; alternative dispute resolution

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 13. 7. 2020 09:04, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The right to be heard is one of the key instruments that ensure adequate protection of the participants´ rights during the proceedings before the administrative authority. This requirement is especially important in administrative offences proceedings due to fact that administrative bodies may issue also very serious sanctions and it is important to enable the offenders to influence the outcome of proceedings. Therefore may participants raise their objections, opinions, suggestions. The authors also focus on issues related to the possibility oftive offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences. alternative approaches to administrative sanctions and related issues concerning ensuring adequate position of offender. These questions have not yet attracted doctrinal attention. Article analyses the currently accepted new legislation on administrative offences proceeding, with overlaps resulting from the Council of Europe documents and including basic comparison with the processing on administrative offences in Germany and Poland. In addition, to the basic analysis of the new legislation benefits, the authors pay attention to the new instrument of “legal settlement” that allows administrative authorities to approve agreemeint between offender and injured party about committed administrative offence and the associated remedy. The new institute is worthy researching, particularly because it is one of the first attempts to adopt alternative approaches to administrative offences proceedings and brings new challenges for administrative authorities. This new institute is compared with the legislation in Germany and Poland. Also methods of analysis of legal requirements of legal documents of Council of Europe and national legislation, normative analysis, literature review and deduction were used in this connection. Authors reached a rather interesting conclusion that the approaches to ADR in administrative offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences.

Návaznosti

GA13-30730S, projekt VaV

Název: Prostředky ochrany subjektivních práv ve veřejné správě, jejich systém a efektivnost

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Prostředky ochrany subjektivních práv ve veřejné správě, jejich systém a efektivnost

Přiložené soubory

Skulova_Brazina.pdf

Vyhledat podobné dokumenty

Citovat

SKULOVÁ, Soňa a Radislav BRAŽINA. New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions. Central European Public Administration Review. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 2018, roč. 16, č. 1, s. 161-178. ISSN 2591-2240. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2018.1.9.

@article{1419768,
   author = {Skulová, Soňa and Bražina, Radislav},
   article_location = {Ljubljana},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2018.1.9},
   keywords = {right to be heard; administrative offences; administrative offences proceedings; alternative dispute resolution},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2591-2240},
   journal = {Central European Public Administration Review},
   title = {New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions},
   url = {http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/363/pdf_73},
   volume = {16},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1419768
AU  - Skulová, Soňa - Bražina, Radislav
PY  - 2018
TI  - New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions
JF  - Central European Public Administration Review
VL  - 16
IS  - 1
SP  - 161-178
EP  - 161-178
PB  - University of Ljubljana
SN  - 25912240
KW  - right to be heard
KW  - administrative offences
KW  - administrative offences proceedings
KW  - alternative dispute resolution
UR  - http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/363/pdf_73
L2  - http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/363/pdf_73
N2  - The right to be heard is one of the key instruments that ensure adequate protection of the participants´ rights during the proceedings before the administrative authority. This requirement is especially important in administrative offences proceedings due to fact that administrative bodies may issue also very serious sanctions and it is important to enable the offenders to influence the outcome of proceedings. Therefore may participants raise their objections, opinions, suggestions. The authors also focus on issues related to the possibility oftive offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences. alternative approaches to administrative sanctions and related issues concerning ensuring adequate position of offender. These questions have not yet attracted doctrinal attention. Article analyses the currently accepted new legislation on administrative offences proceeding, with overlaps resulting from the Council of Europe documents and including basic comparison with the processing on administrative offences in Germany and Poland. In addition, to the basic analysis of the new legislation benefits, the authors pay attention to the new instrument of “legal settlement” that allows administrative authorities to approve agreemeint between offender and injured party about committed administrative offence and the associated remedy. The new institute is worthy researching, particularly because it is one of the first attempts to adopt alternative approaches to administrative offences proceedings and brings new challenges for administrative authorities. This new institute is compared with the legislation in Germany and Poland. Also methods of analysis of legal requirements of legal documents of Council of Europe and national legislation, normative analysis, literature review and deduction were used in this connection. Authors reached a rather interesting conclusion that the approaches to ADR in administrative offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences.
ER  -

SKULOVÁ, Soňa a Radislav BRAŽINA. New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions. \textit{Central European Public Administration Review}. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 2018, roč.~16, č.~1, s.~161-178. ISSN~2591-2240. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2018.1.9.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci