2018
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
JELINEK, T., V. MAISNAR, Luděk POUR, I. SPICKA, J. MINARIK et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
Autoři
JELINEK, T. (203 Česká republika), V. MAISNAR (203 Česká republika), Luděk POUR (203 Česká republika, domácí), I. SPICKA (203 Česká republika), J. MINARIK (203 Česká republika), E. GREGORA (203 Česká republika), P. KESSLER (203 Česká republika), M. SYKORA (203 Česká republika), H. FRANKOVA (203 Česká republika), D. ADAMOVA (203 Česká republika), M. WROBEL (203 Česká republika), P. MIKULA (203 Česká republika), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), J. DIELS (56 Belgie), X. GATOPOULOU (300 Řecko), S. VESELA (203 Česká republika), H. BESSON (56 Belgie), Lucie BROŽOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), T. ITO (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko) a R. HAJEK (203 Česká republika, garant)
Vydání
Current medical research and opinion, Oxon, Taylor & Francis, 2018, 0300-7995
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30218 General and internal medicine
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.345
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00103214
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000430209400003
Klíčová slova anglicky
Czech Republic; multiple myeloma; daratumumab; matching adjusted indirect comparison; treatment outcomes
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 3. 2019 10:25, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Objectives: We conducted an adjusted comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for daratumumab monotherapy versus standard of care, as observed in a real-world historical cohort of heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients from Czech Republic. Methods: Using longitudinal chart data from the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group, patient-level data from the RMG was pooled with pivotal daratumumab monotherapy studies (GEN501 and SIRIUS; 16mg/kg). Results: From the RMG database, we identified 972 treatment lines in 463 patients previously treated with both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug. Treatment initiation dates for RMG patients were between March 2006 and March 2015. The most frequently used treatment regimens were lenalidomide-based regimens (33.4%), chemotherapy (18.1%), bortezomib-based regimens (13.6%), thalidomide-based regimens (8.0%), and bortezomib plus thalidomide (5.3%). Few patients were treated with carfilzomib-based regimens (2.5%) and pomalidomide-based regimens (2.4%). Median observed PFS for daratumumab and the RMG cohort was 4.0 and 5.8 months (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.39), respectively, and unadjusted median OS was 20.1 and 11.9 months (unadjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.78), respectively. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made using patient-level data. The adjusted HRs (95% CI) for PFS and OS for daratumumab versus the RMG cohort were 0.79 (0.56-1.12; p=.192) and 0.33 (0.21-0.52; p<.001), respectively. Conclusions: Adjusted comparisons between trial data and historical cohorts can provide useful insights to clinicians and reimbursement decision makers on relative treatment efficacies in the absence of head-to-head comparison studies for daratumumab monotherapy.