Fast, frugal and correct? An experimental study on the
influence of time scarcity and quantity of information on the
voter decision making process

J 2018

Fast, frugal and correct? An experimental study on the influence of time scarcity and quantity of information on the voter decision making process

TÓTH, Michal a Roman CHYTILEK

Základní údaje

Originální název

Fast, frugal and correct? An experimental study on the influence of time scarcity and quantity of information on the voter decision making process

Autoři

TÓTH, Michal a Roman CHYTILEK

Vydání

Public Choice, Springer, 2018, 0048-5829

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

článek

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.970

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/18:00103241

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

Decision making; Political information; Correct vote; Heuristics; Issue voting

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 20. 6. 2019 13:28, doc. PhDr. Roman Chytilek, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Classical theories of political representation claim that high levels of political knowledge and awareness across the electorate are crucial for a well-functioning democracy. In real life, though, the actual amount of political information possessed by voters is small and unevenly distributed. In addition, electoral decision making is complex and often characterized by severe time pressure. This study therefore experimentally tests the theoretical framework of “fast and frugal” voters and the “less-is-more effect” (Gigerenzer and Goldstein in Psychol Rev 103(4):650–669, 1996), which expects that in some instances low levels of political knowledge may actually result in equally good or even better outcomes than in the case of well-informed decisions. It is hence assumed that employing specific cognitive shortcuts can help voters make good and quick decisions, even with a lack of information. We have used a laboratory experiment to create an environment characterized by severe time pressure that allowed for only shallow information search and limited comparisons across alternatives. Subjects were able to base their decisions only on a small number of criteria operationalized by candidates’ positions on current political issues with various levels of perceived salience. Voters appear to simplify decision making by focusing mainly on those policy attitudes they consider important. Consequently, it seems that shifting the decision-making strategy from accuracy to efficiency has no effect on the final outcome.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0850/2017, interní kód MU

Název: Aktuální problémy politologického výzkumu IV.

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Aktuální problémy politologického výzkumu IV., DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Přiložené soubory

Toth-Chytilek2018_Article_FastFrugalAndCorrectAnExperime.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

TÓTH, Michal a Roman CHYTILEK. Fast, frugal and correct? An experimental study on the influence of time scarcity and quantity of information on the voter decision making process. Public Choice. Springer, 2018, roč. 177, 1-2, s. 67-86. ISSN 0048-5829. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0587-4.

@article{1423317,
   author = {Tóth, Michal and Chytilek, Roman},
   article_number = {1-2},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0587-4},
   keywords = {Decision making; Political information; Correct vote; Heuristics; Issue voting},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0048-5829},
   journal = {Public Choice},
   title = {Fast, frugal and correct? An experimental study on the influence of time scarcity and quantity of information on the voter decision making process},
   url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-018-0587-4},
   volume = {177},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1423317
AU  - Tóth, Michal - Chytilek, Roman
PY  - 2018
TI  - Fast, frugal and correct? An experimental study on the influence of time scarcity and quantity of information on the voter decision making process
JF  - Public Choice
VL  - 177
IS  - 1-2
SP  - 67-86
EP  - 67-86
PB  - Springer
SN  - 00485829
KW  - Decision making
KW  - Political information
KW  - Correct vote
KW  - Heuristics
KW  - Issue voting
UR  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-018-0587-4
L2  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-018-0587-4
N2  - Classical theories of political representation claim that high levels of political knowledge and awareness across the electorate are crucial for a well-functioning democracy. In real life, though, the actual amount of political information possessed by voters is small and unevenly distributed. In addition, electoral decision making is complex and often characterized by severe time pressure. This study therefore experimentally tests the theoretical framework of “fast and frugal” voters and the “less-is-more effect” (Gigerenzer and Goldstein in Psychol Rev 103(4):650–669, 1996), which expects that in some instances low levels of political knowledge may actually result in equally good or even better outcomes than in the case of well-informed decisions. It is hence assumed that employing specific cognitive shortcuts can help voters make good and quick decisions, even with a lack of information. We have used a laboratory experiment to create an environment characterized by severe time pressure that allowed for only shallow information search and limited comparisons across alternatives. Subjects were able to base their decisions only on a small number of criteria operationalized by candidates’ positions on current political issues with various levels of perceived salience. Voters appear to simplify decision making by focusing mainly on those policy attitudes they consider important. Consequently, it seems that shifting the decision-making strategy from accuracy to efficiency has no effect on the final outcome.
ER  -

TÓTH, Michal a Roman CHYTILEK. Fast, frugal and correct? An experimental study on the influence of time scarcity and quantity of information on the voter decision making process. \textit{Public Choice}. Springer, 2018, roč.~177, 1-2, s.~67-86. ISSN~0048-5829. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0587-4.

Přehled o publikaci