Public Opinion & Media Coverage vis-à-vis the Judicial
Independence of the Czech Constitutional Judges

k 2018

Public Opinion & Media Coverage vis-à-vis the Judicial Independence of the Czech Constitutional Judges

HANYCH, Monika a Jaroslav BENÁK

Základní údaje

Originální název

Public Opinion & Media Coverage vis-à-vis the Judicial Independence of the Czech Constitutional Judges

Autoři

HANYCH, Monika a Jaroslav BENÁK

Vydání

ECPR 2018 General Conference, 2018

Další údaje

Jazyk

čeština

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

ECPR 2018

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

mimoprávní vlivy, soudnictví, ústavní soud, média, veřejné mínění

Klíčová slova anglicky

extralegal factors, judiciary, constitutional court, media, public opinion

Štítky

mimoprávní vlivy, soudnictví, soudní rozhodování, veřejné mínění, vliv médií, Ústavní soud

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 24. 8. 2018 14:56, Mgr. Bc. Monika Hanych, Ph.D., LL.M.

Anotace

V originále

Public opinion influence is one of those undisputedly impactful on judicial decision-making (Friedman 2010, Epstein & Martin 2012 or Lim et al. 2015) as courts themselves rely not only upon support from the elected branches of government to use its power (Ferejohn 1999) but also on a reservoir of public support (Clark 2011; Zilis 2015). But how does public opinion influence judges while deciding their cases? What is the approach of judges towards media coverage of their decisions and the role in shaping public opinion? In our research, we led a dozen of in-depth interviews with former and current judges of the Czech Constitutional Court to find out the answers. The aim of this paper is thus to present our observations and conclusions based on qualitative data, specifically what is their media approach and public opinion strategies and vice versa, what is the influence of public opinion to their decision-making. Moreover, we confronted the obtained information with media coverage as well as the behaviour of judges while deciding and voting the cases as to clash their position with real positions of judges. We can, therefore, offer a complex image of how the judges of Czech Constitutional Court approach the media, how they reflect public opinion or whether and how they try to shape the public opinion in connection with media by their own behaviour and decisions.

Návaznosti

GA17-10100S, projekt VaV

Název: Mimoprávní vlivy na rozhodování Ústavního soudu (Akronym: Extralegal)

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Mimoprávní vlivy na rozhodování Ústavního soudu

Citovat

HANYCH, Monika a Jaroslav BENÁK. Public Opinion & Media Coverage vis-à-vis the Judicial Independence of the Czech Constitutional Judges. In ECPR 2018 General Conference. 2018.

@proceedings{1429505,
   author = {Hanych, Monika and Benák, Jaroslav},
   booktitle = {ECPR 2018 General Conference},
   keywords = {extralegal factors, judiciary, constitutional court, media, public opinion},
   language = {cze},
   title = {Public Opinion & Media Coverage vis-à-vis the Judicial Independence of the Czech Constitutional Judges},
   url = {https://ecpr.eu/Events/EventDetails.aspx?EventID=115},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1429505
AU  - Hanych, Monika - Benák, Jaroslav
PY  - 2018
TI  - Public Opinion & Media Coverage vis-à-vis the Judicial Independence of the Czech Constitutional Judges
KW  - extralegal factors, judiciary, constitutional court, media, public opinion
UR  - https://ecpr.eu/Events/EventDetails.aspx?EventID=115
N2  - Public opinion influence is one of those undisputedly impactful on judicial decision-making (Friedman 2010, Epstein & Martin 2012 or Lim et al. 2015) as courts themselves rely not only upon support from the elected branches of government to use its power (Ferejohn 1999) but also on a reservoir of public support (Clark 2011; Zilis 2015). But how does public opinion influence judges while deciding their cases? What is the approach of judges towards media coverage of their decisions and the role in shaping public opinion? In our research, we led a dozen of in-depth interviews with former and current judges of the Czech Constitutional Court to find out the answers. The aim of this paper is thus to present our observations and conclusions based on qualitative data, specifically what is their media approach and public opinion strategies and vice versa, what is the influence of public opinion to their decision-making. Moreover, we confronted the obtained information with media coverage as well as the behaviour of judges while deciding and voting the cases as to clash their position with real positions of judges. We can, therefore, offer a complex image of how the judges of Czech Constitutional Court approach the media, how they reflect public opinion or whether and how they try to shape the public opinion in connection with media by their own behaviour and decisions.
ER  -

HANYCH, Monika a Jaroslav BENÁK. Public Opinion \&{} Media Coverage vis-à-vis the Judicial Independence of the Czech Constitutional Judges. In \textit{ECPR 2018 General Conference}. 2018.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci