2018
Sdvigi v refleksii Vladimira Solovjova v češskoj i slovackoj srede
POLEDNÍKOVÁ, MarkétaZákladní údaje
Originální název
Sdvigi v refleksii Vladimira Solovjova v češskoj i slovackoj srede
Název anglicky
The Shifts in the Reflection of the Work by Vladimir Solovyov in the Czech and Slovak Environment
Autoři
Vydání
Brno, Střední Evropa včera a dnes: proměny koncepcí II, od s. 353-362, 393 s. 2018
Další údaje
Jazyk
ruština
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
Solovyov; Czech philosophy; shifts in reflections
Změněno: 25. 10. 2020 21:20, Mgr. et Mgr. Markéta Chvaja
V originále
The paper introduces reflections of philosophy of Vladimir S. Solovyov, Russian philosopher, in Czech and Slovak (or Czechoslovak) environment. The main reflections of the first half of 20th century are shown in the first part of the paper. Solovyovs works dedicated to practical philosophical disciplines became the main subject of researches in that time, what shows the major orientation of domestic philosophy of that time. The next part briefly describes the era from 1948 to 1989, when Solovyov became an undesirable author in our country. And in the last part we give attention to reception of Solovyovʼs heritage in last decades. We show that today tendency favors theoretical disciplines and we can recognize the movement towards different ways of perception, understanding and expressing of the universe (theology, mystique, poetry).
Anglicky
The paper introduces reflections of philosophy of Vladimir S. Solovyov, Russian philosopher, in Czech and Slovak (or Czechoslovak) environment. The main reflections of the first half of 20th century are shown in the first part of the paper. Solovyovs works dedicated to practical philosophical disciplines became the main subject of researches in that time, what shows the major orientation of domestic philosophy of that time. The next part briefly describes the era from 1948 to 1989, when Solovyov became an undesirable author in our country. And in the last part we give attention to reception of Solovyovʼs heritage in last decades. We show that today tendency favors theoretical disciplines and we can recognize the movement towards different ways of perception, understanding and expressing of the universe (theology, mystique, poetry).