Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1446176, author = {Filipovský, Jan and Seidlerová, Jitka and Ceral, Jiří and Vysočanová, Petra and Špác, Jiří and Souček, Miroslav and Řiháček, Ivan and Mateřánková, Markéta and König, Petr and Rosolová, Hana}, article_location = {London}, article_number = {4}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606}, keywords = {Automated blood pressure; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; attended blood pressure; BPTru device; blood pressure measurement}, language = {eng}, issn = {0803-7051}, journal = {Blood Pressure}, title = {A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients}, volume = {27}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1446176 AU - Filipovský, Jan - Seidlerová, Jitka - Ceral, Jiří - Vysočanová, Petra - Špác, Jiří - Souček, Miroslav - Řiháček, Ivan - Mateřánková, Markéta - König, Petr - Rosolová, Hana PY - 2018 TI - A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients JF - Blood Pressure VL - 27 IS - 4 SP - 188-193 EP - 188-193 PB - INFORMA HEALTHCARE SN - 08037051 KW - Automated blood pressure KW - ambulatory blood pressure monitoring KW - attended blood pressure KW - BPTru device KW - blood pressure measurement N2 - Aims: Unattended automated office blood pressure (uAutoOBP) may eliminate white-coat effect. In the present study, we studied its relationships to attended office blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).Material and methods: Stable treated hypertensive subjects were examined in four Czech academic hypertension centres. uAutoOBP was measured with the BP Tru device; attended BP was measured six times: three times with auscultatory method (AuscOBP) by the physician followed optionally by three oscillometric measurements (OscOBP). ABPM was performed within one week from the clinical visit.Results: Data on 172 subjects aged 63.712.4 years with AuscOBP 127.6 +/- 12.1/77.6 +/- 10.0mm Hg are reported. uAutoOBP was by 8.5 +/- 9.0/3.0 +/- 6.1mm Hg lower than AuscOBP. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference increased with the AuscOBP level and it did not depend on any other factor. OscOBP differed by 8.6 +/- 8.6/1.9 +/- 5.7mm Hg from uAutoOBP. 24-hour mean BP was by 4.2 +/- 12.1/3.5 +/- 7.8mm Hg lower than AuscOBP and by 4.3 +/- 11.0/0.5 +/- 6.9mm Hg higher than uAutoOBP; the correlation coefficients of 24-hour mean BP with AuscOBP and with uAutoOBP did not differ (p for difference.13). In the lowest BP group (systolic AuscOBP<120mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP<70mm Hg), both AuscOBP and uAutoOBP were lower than 24-hour mean BP, while in the highest BP group (systolic AuscOBP140mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP90mm Hg), they were higher.Conclusions: Compared to uAutoOBP, attended BP measurement gives higher values, both when measured with auscultatory or oscillometric method. Inter-individual variability of AutoOBP - uAuscOBP difference, as well of uAutoOBP - ABPM difference, is large. We did not prove that uAutoOBP would be associated to 24-hour ambulatory BP more closely than attended BP. ER -
FILIPOVSKÝ, Jan, Jitka SEIDLEROVÁ, Jiří CERAL, Petra VYSOČANOVÁ, Jiří ŠPÁC, Miroslav SOUČEK, Ivan ŘIHÁČEK, Markéta MATEŘÁNKOVÁ, Petr KÖNIG a Hana ROSOLOVÁ. A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients. \textit{Blood Pressure}. London: INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 2018, roč.~27, č.~4, s.~188-193. ISSN~0803-7051. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606.
|