Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1446176,
author = {Filipovský, Jan and Seidlerová, Jitka and Ceral, Jiří and Vysočanová, Petra and Špác, Jiří and Souček, Miroslav and Řiháček, Ivan and Mateřánková, Markéta and König, Petr and Rosolová, Hana},
article_location = {London},
article_number = {4},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606},
keywords = {Automated blood pressure; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; attended blood pressure; BPTru device; blood pressure measurement},
language = {eng},
issn = {0803-7051},
journal = {Blood Pressure},
title = {A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients},
volume = {27},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1446176
AU - Filipovský, Jan - Seidlerová, Jitka - Ceral, Jiří - Vysočanová, Petra - Špác, Jiří - Souček, Miroslav - Řiháček, Ivan - Mateřánková, Markéta - König, Petr - Rosolová, Hana
PY - 2018
TI - A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients
JF - Blood Pressure
VL - 27
IS - 4
SP - 188-193
EP - 188-193
PB - INFORMA HEALTHCARE
SN - 08037051
KW - Automated blood pressure
KW - ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
KW - attended blood pressure
KW - BPTru device
KW - blood pressure measurement
N2 - Aims: Unattended automated office blood pressure (uAutoOBP) may eliminate white-coat effect. In the present study, we studied its relationships to attended office blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).Material and methods: Stable treated hypertensive subjects were examined in four Czech academic hypertension centres. uAutoOBP was measured with the BP Tru device; attended BP was measured six times: three times with auscultatory method (AuscOBP) by the physician followed optionally by three oscillometric measurements (OscOBP). ABPM was performed within one week from the clinical visit.Results: Data on 172 subjects aged 63.712.4 years with AuscOBP 127.6 +/- 12.1/77.6 +/- 10.0mm Hg are reported. uAutoOBP was by 8.5 +/- 9.0/3.0 +/- 6.1mm Hg lower than AuscOBP. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference increased with the AuscOBP level and it did not depend on any other factor. OscOBP differed by 8.6 +/- 8.6/1.9 +/- 5.7mm Hg from uAutoOBP. 24-hour mean BP was by 4.2 +/- 12.1/3.5 +/- 7.8mm Hg lower than AuscOBP and by 4.3 +/- 11.0/0.5 +/- 6.9mm Hg higher than uAutoOBP; the correlation coefficients of 24-hour mean BP with AuscOBP and with uAutoOBP did not differ (p for difference.13). In the lowest BP group (systolic AuscOBP<120mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP<70mm Hg), both AuscOBP and uAutoOBP were lower than 24-hour mean BP, while in the highest BP group (systolic AuscOBP140mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP90mm Hg), they were higher.Conclusions: Compared to uAutoOBP, attended BP measurement gives higher values, both when measured with auscultatory or oscillometric method. Inter-individual variability of AutoOBP - uAuscOBP difference, as well of uAutoOBP - ABPM difference, is large. We did not prove that uAutoOBP would be associated to 24-hour ambulatory BP more closely than attended BP.
ER -
FILIPOVSKÝ, Jan, Jitka SEIDLEROVÁ, Jiří CERAL, Petra VYSOČANOVÁ, Jiří ŠPÁC, Miroslav SOUČEK, Ivan ŘIHÁČEK, Markéta MATEŘÁNKOVÁ, Petr KÖNIG and Hana ROSOLOVÁ. A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients. \textit{Blood Pressure}. London: INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 2018, vol.~27, No~4, p.~188-193. ISSN~0803-7051. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606.
|
