D 2018

INSTRUCTING PATIENTS PRIOR TO AND AFTER VASCULAR PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION

JUŘENÍKOVÁ, Petra, Lenka TŘÍLETÁ, Robert STAFFA a Tomáš NOVOTNÝ

Základní údaje

Originální název

INSTRUCTING PATIENTS PRIOR TO AND AFTER VASCULAR PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION

Autoři

JUŘENÍKOVÁ, Petra (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Lenka TŘÍLETÁ (203 Česká republika), Robert STAFFA (203 Česká republika) a Tomáš NOVOTNÝ (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

5. vyd. Sofia Bulgaria, 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Art SGEM 2018, od s. 325-330, 1042 s. 2018

Nakladatel

STEF92 Technology Ltd.

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

30301 Social biomedical sciences

Stát vydavatele

Bulharsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/18:00106943

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

ISBN

978-619-7408-55-3

ISSN

DOI

Klíčová slova česky

informace před a po operaci; implantace cévní protézy, pacient

Klíčová slova anglicky

information prior to and after the surgery; vascular prosthesis implantation; patient

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 31. 10. 2018 12:55, Mgr. Petra Juřeníková, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The goal of the study was to find out how and to which extent patients are informed before and after their vascular prosthesis implantation. The criterion for being included in the study was to achieve at least 24 points of Mini Mental State Examination and to meet the established indication criteria for the surgery. The ethical committee of the health care facility and all participants, who were informed on the purpose of the study, agreed with the study. Crohnbach`s alpha was calculated to identify internal consistency and reliability of questionnaires. The study results were processed by Pearson`s chi-squared test at 5% level of significance.The respondents` mean age was 68 years. Prior to the surgery, 66% of the respondents were instructed verbally, 6% in the written form and 28% both verbally and in the written form. After the surgery, 54% of the respondents were instructed verbally, 0% only in the written form and 46% both verbally and in the written form. On the satisfaction scale from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very dissatisfied), satisfaction was evaluated with 1.46 (amount of information), 1.47 (comprehensibility), and 1.38 (way of providing information). After the surgery: amount of information – 1.56, comprehensibility – 1.52, and way of providing information – 1.57. The study results show good instructions and patient satisfaction. Suitable and correctly provided information both in verbal and written form contribute to higher patient adherence to treatment.

Návaznosti

NV15-33437A, projekt VaV
Název: Vliv edukace na vybrané psychosomatické faktory u pacientů indikovaných k implantaci cévní protézy