Reality Is Not a Solid: Poetic Transfigurations of Stevens’
Fluid Concept of Reality

C 2018

Reality Is Not a Solid: Poetic Transfigurations of Stevens’ Fluid Concept of Reality

MÁCHA, Jakub

Základní údaje

Originální název

Reality Is Not a Solid: Poetic Transfigurations of Stevens’ Fluid Concept of Reality

Autoři

MÁCHA, Jakub

Vydání

Berlin, Wallace Stevens: Poetry, Philosophy, and Figurative Language, od s. 61-92, 32 s. Studies in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, vol. 13, 2018

Nakladatel

Peter Lang

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

60301 Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Stát vydavatele

Německo

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

pdf, Publisher

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/18:00104649

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

ISBN

978-3-631-76951-5

Klíčová slova anglicky

Wallace Stevens; Poetry; Philosophy; Figurative Language

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 10. 5. 2020 14:13, prof. Dr. phil. Jakub Mácha, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The main aim of this essay is to show that, for Stevens, the concept of reality is very fluctuating. The essay begins with addressing the relationship between poetry and philosophy. I argue, contra Critchley, that Stevens’ poetic work can elucidate, or at least help us to understand better, the ideas of philosophers that are usually considered obscure. The main “obscure” philosophical work introduced in and discussed throughout the essay is Schelling’s System of Transcendental Idealism. Both a (shellingian) philosopher and a (stevensian) poet search for reality. In order to understand Stevens’ poetry better, I distingush several concepts of reality: initial reality (the external world of the common sense), imagined reality (a fiction, a product of one’s mind), final reality (the object of a philosopher’s and a poet’s search) and total reality (the sum of all realities, Being). These determinations are fixed by reason (in the present essay), whereas in Stevens’ poetic works, they are made fluid by the imagination. This fluidity leads the concept of reality from its initial stage through the imagined stage to its final stage. Throughout this process, imagined reality must be distinguished from both a mere fancy and its products. Final reality is, however, nothing transcendent. It is rather a general transpersonal order of reality created by poetry/the imagination. The main peculiarity of final reality is that it is a dynamic order. It is provisional at each moment. Stevens (and Schelling too) characterizes this order as that of a work of art which is a finite object, but has an infinite meaning. Stevens calls this order “the central poem” or the “endlessly elaborating poem”. If ultimate reality is a poem created by the imagination, one may ask who is the imagining subject. I argue that this agent is best to be thought as total reality, that is, as Being. Stevens, however, maintains that if there were such an agency, it would be an inhuman agency, “an inhuman meditation”. The essay concludes, in a Derridian manner, with the claim that this agency cannot have any name; it is the “unnamed creator of an unknown sphere, / Unknown as yet, unknowable, / Uncertain certainty” (OP: 127). It is best thought as an X, as an unknown variable. Being has no name.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0963/2017, interní kód MU

Název: Cesty k soudobé filozofii

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Cesty k soudobé filozofii, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Přiložené soubory

Macha_-_Reality_is_not_a_solid.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

MÁCHA, Jakub. Reality Is Not a Solid: Poetic Transfigurations of Stevens’ Fluid Concept of Reality. In Bartczak, Kacper; Mácha, Jakub. Wallace Stevens: Poetry, Philosophy, and Figurative Language. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2018, s. 61-92. Studies in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, vol. 13. ISBN 978-3-631-76951-5.

@inbook{1472603,
   author = {Mácha, Jakub},
   address = {Berlin},
   booktitle = {Wallace Stevens: Poetry, Philosophy, and Figurative Language},
   editor = {Bartczak, Kacper; Mácha, Jakub},
   keywords = {Wallace Stevens; Poetry; Philosophy; Figurative Language},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Berlin},
   isbn = {978-3-631-76951-5},
   pages = {61-92},
   publisher = {Peter Lang},
   title = {Reality Is Not a Solid: Poetic Transfigurations of Stevens’ Fluid Concept of Reality},
   url = {https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631769539/html/ch11.xhtml},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1472603
AU  - Mácha, Jakub
PY  - 2018
TI  - Reality Is Not a Solid: Poetic Transfigurations of Stevens’ Fluid Concept of Reality
VL  - Studies in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, vol. 13
PB  - Peter Lang
CY  - Berlin
SN  - 9783631769515
KW  - Wallace Stevens
KW  - Poetry
KW  - Philosophy
KW  - Figurative Language
UR  - https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631769539/html/ch11.xhtml
L2  - https://is.muni.cz/repo/1472603/Macha_-_Reality_is_not_a_solid.pdf
N2  - The main aim of this essay is to show that, for Stevens, the concept of reality is very fluctuating. The essay begins with addressing the relationship between poetry and philosophy. I argue, contra Critchley, that Stevens’ poetic work can elucidate, or at least help us to understand better, the ideas of philosophers that are usually considered obscure. The main “obscure” philosophical work introduced in and discussed throughout the essay is Schelling’s System of Transcendental Idealism. Both a (shellingian) philosopher and a (stevensian) poet search for reality. In order to understand Stevens’ poetry better, I distingush several concepts of reality: initial reality (the external world of the common sense), imagined reality (a fiction, a product of one’s mind), final reality (the object of a philosopher’s and a poet’s search) and total reality (the sum of all realities, Being). These determinations are fixed by reason (in the present essay), whereas in Stevens’ poetic works, they are made fluid by the imagination. This fluidity leads the concept of reality from its initial stage through the imagined stage to its final stage. Throughout this process, imagined reality must be distinguished from both a mere fancy and its products. Final reality is, however, nothing transcendent. It is rather a general transpersonal order of reality created by poetry/the imagination. The main peculiarity of final reality is that it is a dynamic order. It is provisional at each moment. Stevens (and Schelling too) characterizes this order as that of a work of art which is a finite object, but has an infinite meaning. Stevens calls this order “the central poem” or the “endlessly elaborating poem”. If ultimate reality is a poem created by the imagination, one may ask who is the imagining subject. I argue that this agent is best to be thought as total reality, that is, as Being. Stevens, however, maintains that if there were such an agency, it would be an inhuman agency, “an inhuman meditation”. The essay concludes, in a Derridian manner, with the claim that this agency cannot have any name; it is the “unnamed creator of an unknown sphere, / Unknown as yet, unknowable, / Uncertain certainty” (OP: 127). It is best thought as an X, as an unknown variable. Being has no name.
ER  -

MÁCHA, Jakub. Reality Is Not a Solid: Poetic Transfigurations of Stevens’ Fluid Concept of Reality. In Bartczak, Kacper; Mácha, Jakub. \textit{Wallace Stevens: Poetry, Philosophy, and Figurative Language}. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2018, s.~61-92. Studies in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, vol. 13. ISBN~978-3-631-76951-5.

Přehled o publikaci