PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír, Filip MAREK, Lumír KUNOVSKÝ, Roman SVATOŇ, Tomáš GROLICH, Petr MORAVČÍK, Martina FARKAŠOVÁ a Zdeněk KALA. Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND. LONDON: ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND, 2018, roč. 100, č. 7, s. 509-514. ISSN 0035-8843. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning
Autoři PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír (203 Česká republika, domácí), Filip MAREK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Lumír KUNOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Roman SVATOŇ (703 Slovensko, domácí), Tomáš GROLICH (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr MORAVČÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Martina FARKAŠOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí) a Zdeněk KALA (203 Česká republika, domácí).
Vydání ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, LONDON, ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND, 2018, 0035-8843.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30212 Surgery
Stát vydavatele Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 1.259
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104706
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066
UT WoS 000448507400012
Klíčová slova anglicky Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic stenosis; Oesophageal carcinoma; Minimally invasive oesophagectomy; Stomach ischaemic conditioning
Štítky 14110213, 14110223, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Změněno: 9. 2. 2019 21:47.
Anotace
BACKGROUND Stomach preparation by ischaemic conditioning prior to oesophageal resection represents a potential method of reducing the risk of anastomotic complications. This study compares the results of the anastomotic complications of cervical anastomosis after oesophagectomy with a short interval after ischaemic conditioning (group S) and a long interval (group L). METHODS Subjects undergoing oesophagectomy for carcinoma after ischaemic conditioning were divided into two groups. Group S had a median interval between ischaemic conditioning and resection of 20 days, while for group L the median interval was 49 days. Anastomotic leak and anastomotic stenosis in relation to the interval between ischaemic conditioning and actual resection were followed. RESULTS After ischaemic conditioning, 33 subjects in total underwent surgery for carcinoma; 19 subjects in group S and 14 subjects in group L. Anastomotic leak incidence was comparable in both groups. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 21% of cases in group S and 7% of cases in group L (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION A long interval between ischaemic conditioning and oesophagectomy does not adversely affect the postoperative complications. A lower incidence of anastomosis stenoses was found in subjects with a longer interval, however, given the size of our sample, the statistical significance was not demonstrated. Both groups seem comparable in surgical procedure course and postoperative complications.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 21. 7. 2024 13:19