Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after
oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the
stomach ischaemic conditioning

J 2018

Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning

PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír, Filip MAREK, Lumír KUNOVSKÝ, Roman SVATOŇ, Tomáš GROLICH et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning

Autoři

PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír (203 Česká republika, domácí), Filip MAREK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Lumír KUNOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Roman SVATOŇ (703 Slovensko, domácí), Tomáš GROLICH (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr MORAVČÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Martina FARKAŠOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí) a Zdeněk KALA (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, LONDON, ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND, 2018, 0035-8843

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30212 Surgery

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.259

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104706

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066

UT WoS

000448507400012

Klíčová slova anglicky

Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic stenosis; Oesophageal carcinoma; Minimally invasive oesophagectomy; Stomach ischaemic conditioning

Štítky

14110213, 14110223, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 9. 2. 2019 21:47, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

BACKGROUND Stomach preparation by ischaemic conditioning prior to oesophageal resection represents a potential method of reducing the risk of anastomotic complications. This study compares the results of the anastomotic complications of cervical anastomosis after oesophagectomy with a short interval after ischaemic conditioning (group S) and a long interval (group L). METHODS Subjects undergoing oesophagectomy for carcinoma after ischaemic conditioning were divided into two groups. Group S had a median interval between ischaemic conditioning and resection of 20 days, while for group L the median interval was 49 days. Anastomotic leak and anastomotic stenosis in relation to the interval between ischaemic conditioning and actual resection were followed. RESULTS After ischaemic conditioning, 33 subjects in total underwent surgery for carcinoma; 19 subjects in group S and 14 subjects in group L. Anastomotic leak incidence was comparable in both groups. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 21% of cases in group S and 7% of cases in group L (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION A long interval between ischaemic conditioning and oesophagectomy does not adversely affect the postoperative complications. A lower incidence of anastomosis stenoses was found in subjects with a longer interval, however, given the size of our sample, the statistical significance was not demonstrated. Both groups seem comparable in surgical procedure course and postoperative complications.

Citovat

PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír, Filip MAREK, Lumír KUNOVSKÝ, Roman SVATOŇ, Tomáš GROLICH, Petr MORAVČÍK, Martina FARKAŠOVÁ a Zdeněk KALA. Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND. LONDON: ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND, 2018, roč. 100, č. 7, s. 509-514. ISSN 0035-8843. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066.

@article{1473277,
   author = {Procházka, Vladimír and Marek, Filip and Kunovský, Lumír and Svatoň, Roman and Grolich, Tomáš and Moravčík, Petr and Farkašová, Martina and Kala, Zdeněk},
   article_location = {LONDON},
   article_number = {7},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066},
   keywords = {Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic stenosis; Oesophageal carcinoma; Minimally invasive oesophagectomy; Stomach ischaemic conditioning},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0035-8843},
   journal = {ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND},
   title = {Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning},
   volume = {100},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1473277
AU  - Procházka, Vladimír - Marek, Filip - Kunovský, Lumír - Svatoň, Roman - Grolich, Tomáš - Moravčík, Petr - Farkašová, Martina - Kala, Zdeněk
PY  - 2018
TI  - Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning
JF  - ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND
VL  - 100
IS  - 7
SP  - 509-514
EP  - 509-514
PB  - ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND
SN  - 00358843
KW  - Anastomotic leak
KW  - Anastomotic stenosis
KW  - Oesophageal carcinoma
KW  - Minimally invasive oesophagectomy
KW  - Stomach ischaemic conditioning
N2  - BACKGROUND Stomach preparation by ischaemic conditioning prior to oesophageal resection represents a potential method of reducing the risk of anastomotic complications. This study compares the results of the anastomotic complications of cervical anastomosis after oesophagectomy with a short interval after ischaemic conditioning (group S) and a long interval (group L). METHODS Subjects undergoing oesophagectomy for carcinoma after ischaemic conditioning were divided into two groups. Group S had a median interval between ischaemic conditioning and resection of 20 days, while for group L the median interval was 49 days. Anastomotic leak and anastomotic stenosis in relation to the interval between ischaemic conditioning and actual resection were followed. RESULTS After ischaemic conditioning, 33 subjects in total underwent surgery for carcinoma; 19 subjects in group S and 14 subjects in group L. Anastomotic leak incidence was comparable in both groups. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 21% of cases in group S and 7% of cases in group L (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION A long interval between ischaemic conditioning and oesophagectomy does not adversely affect the postoperative complications. A lower incidence of anastomosis stenoses was found in subjects with a longer interval, however, given the size of our sample, the statistical significance was not demonstrated. Both groups seem comparable in surgical procedure course and postoperative complications.
ER  -

PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír, Filip MAREK, Lumír KUNOVSKÝ, Roman SVATOŇ, Tomáš GROLICH, Petr MORAVČÍK, Martina FARKAŠOVÁ a Zdeněk KALA. Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning. \textit{ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND}. LONDON: ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND, 2018, roč.~100, č.~7, s.~509-514. ISSN~0035-8843. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci