PLEVA, Leos, Pavel KUKLA, Jana ZAPLETALOVA a Ota HLINOMAZ. Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018, roč. 92, č. 6, s. "E416"-"E424", 9 s. ISSN 1522-1946. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study
Autoři PLEVA, Leos (203 Česká republika, garant), Pavel KUKLA (203 Česká republika), Jana ZAPLETALOVA (203 Česká republika) a Ota HLINOMAZ (203 Česká republika, domácí).
Vydání Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 2018, 1522-1946.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele Spojené státy
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 2.551
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/18:00105325
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688
UT WoS 000451188300007
Klíčová slova anglicky everolimus-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon
Štítky 14110115, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Změněno: 10. 2. 2019 15:37.
Anotace
Background The efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters (PEB) and drug-eluting stents for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis (BMS-ISR) have been demonstrated in several studies with follow-up times of 9 to 12 months; however, the long-term outcomes of ISR treatment are less defined. Objectives Methods We aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of PEB and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for the treatment of BMS-ISR. We analyzed 3-year clinical follow-up data from patients included in the TIS randomized clinical study. A total of 136 patients with BMS-ISR were allocated to receive treatment with either PEB or EES (68 patients with 74 ISR lesions per group). Results Conclusions The PEB and EES groups did not significantly differ in major adverse cardiac events-free survival (MACE; P = .211; including individual events: CV death: P = .622; myocardial infarction: P = .650 or target vessel revascularization: P = .286) at 3-year clinical follow-up. No event-free survival differences were found between the groups regarding overall mortality (P = .818), definite stent thrombosis (P = .165) or the second MACE (P = .270). At the 3-year follow-up, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between iopromide-coated PEB and EES for the treatment of BMS-ISR. (; ; NCT01735825).
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 21. 7. 2024 09:21