Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent
restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or
everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical
study

J 2018

Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study

PLEVA, Leos, Pavel KUKLA, Jana ZAPLETALOVA a Ota HLINOMAZ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study

Autoři

PLEVA, Leos (203 Česká republika, garant), Pavel KUKLA (203 Česká republika), Jana ZAPLETALOVA (203 Česká republika) a Ota HLINOMAZ (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 2018, 1522-1946

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.551

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/18:00105325

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688

UT WoS

000451188300007

Klíčová slova anglicky

everolimus-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon

Štítky

14110115, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 10. 2. 2019 15:37, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Background The efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters (PEB) and drug-eluting stents for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis (BMS-ISR) have been demonstrated in several studies with follow-up times of 9 to 12 months; however, the long-term outcomes of ISR treatment are less defined. Objectives Methods We aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of PEB and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for the treatment of BMS-ISR. We analyzed 3-year clinical follow-up data from patients included in the TIS randomized clinical study. A total of 136 patients with BMS-ISR were allocated to receive treatment with either PEB or EES (68 patients with 74 ISR lesions per group). Results Conclusions The PEB and EES groups did not significantly differ in major adverse cardiac events-free survival (MACE; P = .211; including individual events: CV death: P = .622; myocardial infarction: P = .650 or target vessel revascularization: P = .286) at 3-year clinical follow-up. No event-free survival differences were found between the groups regarding overall mortality (P = .818), definite stent thrombosis (P = .165) or the second MACE (P = .270). At the 3-year follow-up, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between iopromide-coated PEB and EES for the treatment of BMS-ISR. (; ; NCT01735825).

Citovat

PLEVA, Leos, Pavel KUKLA, Jana ZAPLETALOVA a Ota HLINOMAZ. Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018, roč. 92, č. 6, s. "E416"-"E424", 9 s. ISSN 1522-1946. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688.

@article{1484319,
   author = {Pleva, Leos and Kukla, Pavel and Zapletalova, Jana and Hlinomaz, Ota},
   article_location = {Hoboken},
   article_number = {6},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688},
   keywords = {everolimus-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1522-1946},
   journal = {Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions},
   title = {Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study},
   volume = {92},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1484319
AU  - Pleva, Leos - Kukla, Pavel - Zapletalova, Jana - Hlinomaz, Ota
PY  - 2018
TI  - Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study
JF  - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
VL  - 92
IS  - 6
SP  - "E416"-"E424"
EP  - "E416"-"E424"
PB  - Wiley-Blackwell
SN  - 15221946
KW  - everolimus-eluting stent
KW  - in-stent restenosis
KW  - paclitaxel-eluting balloon
N2  - Background The efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters (PEB) and drug-eluting stents for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis (BMS-ISR) have been demonstrated in several studies with follow-up times of 9 to 12 months; however, the long-term outcomes of ISR treatment are less defined. Objectives Methods We aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of PEB and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for the treatment of BMS-ISR. We analyzed 3-year clinical follow-up data from patients included in the TIS randomized clinical study. A total of 136 patients with BMS-ISR were allocated to receive treatment with either PEB or EES (68 patients with 74 ISR lesions per group). Results Conclusions The PEB and EES groups did not significantly differ in major adverse cardiac events-free survival (MACE; P = .211; including individual events: CV death: P = .622; myocardial infarction: P = .650 or target vessel revascularization: P = .286) at 3-year clinical follow-up. No event-free survival differences were found between the groups regarding overall mortality (P = .818), definite stent thrombosis (P = .165) or the second MACE (P = .270). At the 3-year follow-up, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between iopromide-coated PEB and EES for the treatment of BMS-ISR. (; ; NCT01735825).
ER  -

PLEVA, Leos, Pavel KUKLA, Jana ZAPLETALOVA a Ota HLINOMAZ. Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study. \textit{Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions}. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018, roč.~92, č.~6, s.~''E416''-''E424'', 9 s. ISSN~1522-1946. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci