Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of
Cognitive Science of Religion

C 2018

Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion

KUNDT, Radek

Základní údaje

Originální název

Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion

Autoři

KUNDT, Radek (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Leiden, Boston, Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion : A New Synthesis, od s. 141-158, 18 s. Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 13, 2018

Nakladatel

Brill

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

60304 Religious studies

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/18:00105411

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

ISBN

978-90-04-38537-5

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_010

Klíčová slova anglicky

evolution; adaptation; spandrel fallacy; exaptation; Tinbergen`s Four Whys

Štítky

rivok, topvydavatel

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 8. 3. 2019 10:37, Mgr. Monika Kellnerová

Anotace

V originále

Standard Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) Model treats religion as an evolutionary by-product and considers proximate mechanisms, and not ultimate causes, as intrinsic to CSR explanative objectives. Such theoretical stance suggests that the full spectrum of evolutionary analyses is yet to be embraced by the young field. I argue that by transforming the originally legitimate by-product argument aimed against bad practice within the adaptationist programme into an argument against the adaptationist programme itself, and by making the by-product position a default point of departure, CSR turned standard evolutionary logic on its head hampering its own advancements. Furthermore, discussing Tinbergen´s Four Whys, I stress that all four questions of ontogeny, phylogeny, mechanism, and function are of equal importance in our strive for the full CSR project.

Návaznosti

EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaV

Název: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství

Citovat

KUNDT, Radek. Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion. In Petersen, A. K.; Gilhus, I. S.; Martin, L. H.; Jensen, J. S., Soerensen, J. Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion : A New Synthesis. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018, s. 141-158. Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 13. ISBN 978-90-04-38537-5. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_010.

@inbook{1485444,
   author = {Kundt, Radek},
   address = {Leiden, Boston},
   booktitle = {Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion : A New Synthesis},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_010},
   editor = {Petersen, A. K.; Gilhus, I. S.; Martin, L. H.; Jensen, J. S., Soerensen, J.},
   keywords = {evolution; adaptation; spandrel fallacy; exaptation; Tinbergen`s Four Whys},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Leiden, Boston},
   isbn = {978-90-04-38537-5},
   pages = {141-158},
   publisher = {Brill},
   title = {Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1485444
AU  - Kundt, Radek
PY  - 2018
TI  - Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion
VL  - Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 13
PB  - Brill
CY  - Leiden, Boston
SN  - 9789004385375
KW  - evolution
KW  - adaptation
KW  - spandrel fallacy
KW  - exaptation
KW  - Tinbergen`s Four Whys
N2  - Standard Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) Model treats religion as an evolutionary by-product and considers proximate mechanisms, and not ultimate causes, as intrinsic to CSR explanative objectives. Such theoretical stance suggests that the full spectrum of evolutionary analyses is yet to be embraced by the young field. I argue that by transforming the originally legitimate by-product argument aimed against bad practice within the adaptationist programme into an argument against the adaptationist programme itself, and by making the by-product position a default point of departure, CSR turned standard evolutionary logic on its head hampering its own advancements. Furthermore, discussing Tinbergen´s Four Whys, I stress that all four questions of ontogeny, phylogeny, mechanism, and function are of equal importance in our strive for the full CSR project.
ER  -

KUNDT, Radek. Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion. In Petersen, A. K.; Gilhus, I. S.; Martin, L. H.; Jensen, J. S., Soerensen, J. \textit{Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion : A New Synthesis}. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018, s.~141-158. Supplements to Method \&{} Theory in the Study of Religion 13. ISBN~978-90-04-38537-5. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375\_{}010.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci