Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inproceedings{1490378,
author = {Chren, Stanislav and Bühnová, Barbora and Macák, Martin and Daubner, Lukáš and Rossi, Bruno},
address = {Piscataway, NJ, USA},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00019},
editor = {Sarah Beecham, Daniela Damian},
keywords = {Software Engineering; Unified Modelling Language; Common Mistakes; Software Engineering Course},
howpublished = {elektronická verze "online"},
language = {eng},
location = {Piscataway, NJ, USA},
isbn = {978-1-7281-1000-4},
pages = {100-109},
publisher = {IEEE Press},
title = {Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course},
url = {https://lasaris.fi.muni.cz/students/uml-catalogue},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1490378
AU - Chren, Stanislav - Bühnová, Barbora - Macák, Martin - Daubner, Lukáš - Rossi, Bruno
PY - 2019
TI - Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course
PB - IEEE Press
CY - Piscataway, NJ, USA
SN - 9781728110004
KW - Software Engineering
KW - Unified Modelling Language
KW - Common Mistakes
KW - Software Engineering Course
UR - https://lasaris.fi.muni.cz/students/uml-catalogue
L2 - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8802110
N2 - The Unified Modelling Language (UML) is being widely accepted as a standard modelling notation for visualizing software systems during design and development. UML has thus become part of many software engineering course curricula at universities worldwide, providing a recognized tool for practical training of students in understanding and visualizing software design. It is however common that students have difficulties in absorbing UML in its complexity, and often repeat the same mistakes that have been observed by course tutors in previous years. Having a catalogue of such mistakes could hence increase the effectiveness of both teaching and learning of UML diagrams. In this paper, we present such a catalogue, consisting of 146 types of mistakes in eight types of diagrams. As the main contribution of this study, we use this catalogue to guide the analysis of student projects within a software engineering course. In total, over 2,700 diagrams submitted over 12 weeks of a semester by 123 students were analysed to identify the frequency of mistakes (from the catalogue), correlations of the mistakes between different diagram types, correlation of the quality of student projects to exam results, student behaviour in terms of introducing and fixing the mistakes over time, and other interesting insights. The analysis is described together with its setup and execution, and all datasets and detailed guidebook to the catalogue of all mistakes is made available for download.
ER -
CHREN, Stanislav, Barbora BÜHNOVÁ, Martin MACÁK, Lukáš DAUBNER a Bruno ROSSI. Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course. Online. In Sarah Beecham, Daniela Damian. \textit{Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training}. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2019, s.~100-109. ISBN~978-1-7281-1000-4. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00019.
|
