2018
Time-Integrative Passive sampling combined with TOxicity Profiling (TIPTOP): an effect-based strategy for cost-effective chemical water quality assessment
HAMERS, Timo, Jessica LEGRADI, Nick ZWART, Foppe SMEDES, Jasperien DE WEERT et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Time-Integrative Passive sampling combined with TOxicity Profiling (TIPTOP): an effect-based strategy for cost-effective chemical water quality assessment
Autoři
HAMERS, Timo (528 Nizozemské království), Jessica LEGRADI (528 Nizozemské království), Nick ZWART (528 Nizozemské království), Foppe SMEDES (528 Nizozemské království, garant, domácí), Jasperien DE WEERT (528 Nizozemské království), Evert-Jan VAN DEN BRANDHOF (528 Nizozemské království), Dik van DE MEENT (528 Nizozemské království) a Dick DE ZWART (528 Nizozemské království)
Vydání
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2018, 1382-6689
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10511 Environmental sciences
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.061
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/18:00106146
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
000452943000006
Klíčová slova anglicky
Speedisk; silicone rubber; in vitro bioassay; in vivo bioassay; species-sensitivity distribution (SSD); multiple substance potentially affected fraction of species (msPAF); priority compounds; River Meuse
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 10. 2. 2019 21:29, Mgr. Michaela Hylsová, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
This study aimed at demonstrating that effect-based monitoring with passive sampling followed by toxicity profiling is more protective and cost-effective than the current chemical water quality assessment strategy consisting of compound-by-compound chemical analysis of selected substances in grab samples. Passive samplers were deployed in the Dutch river delta and in WWTP effluents. Their extracts were tested in a battery of bioassays and chemically analyzed to obtain toxicity and chemical profiles, respectively. Chemical concentrations in water were retrieved from publicly available databases. Seven different strategies were used to interpret the chemical and toxicity profiles in terms of ecological risk. They all indicated that the river sampling locations were relatively clean. Chemical-based monitoring resulted for many substances in measurements below detection limit and could only explain < 20% of the observed in vitro toxicity. Effect-based monitoring yielded more informative conclusions as it allowed for ranking the sampling sites and for estimating a margin-of-exposure towards chronic effect ranges. Effect-based monitoring was also cheaper and more cost-effective (Le. yielding more information per euro spent). Based on its identified strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT), a future strategy for effect-based monitoring has been proposed.