Emerging doctrine of deference of the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights?

J 2016

Emerging doctrine of deference of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?

TSERETELI, Nino

Základní údaje

Originální název

Emerging doctrine of deference of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?

Autoři

TSERETELI, Nino

Vydání

International journal of human rights, 2016, 1364-2987

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Repozitář MU

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/16:00106202

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Inter-American Court of Human Rights; deference; subsidiarity; legitimacy

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 15. 7. 2020 15:30, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

In its early days, almost all cases examined by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ( IACtHR) involved acts of state violence. Deference to national decision-makers was out of the question, due to their manifest lack of willingness and/or ability to deliver on human rights promises. A partial shift of focus away from such cases, due to the change in a legal and political landscape, created the need for the IACtHR to reconsider its relationship with national jurisdictions and become more deferential. This would enable the IACtHR to ensure conformity of its approach with its subsidiary role and strengthen its legitimacy and effectiveness. This article reflects on how deference does and should operate at each of the two stages of judicial reasoning, norm interpretation and norm application. It asks: does the IACtHR exercise deference? Should it exercise deference? If so, with regard to what, under what conditions and to what extent? As regards norm interpretation, the article suggests ways of adopting a middle ground between overreliance on national interpretations to the detriment of individuals and complete disregard of those interpretations at the risk of antagonising states. As regards norm application, it suggests that some of the recent judgments signalled the willingness of the IACtHR to exercise deference (refusing to impose its determination of consequences that should follow from the treaty norms in the given situation) and calls for a clear articulation of conditions and the extent of deference.

Přiložené soubory

Emerging_doctrine.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

TSERETELI, Nino. Emerging doctrine of deference of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights? International journal of human rights. 2016, roč. 20, č. 8, s. 1097-1112. ISSN 1364-2987. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1254875.

@article{1497030,
   author = {Tsereteli, Nino},
   article_number = {8},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1254875},
   keywords = {Inter-American Court of Human Rights; deference; subsidiarity; legitimacy},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1364-2987},
   journal = {International journal of human rights},
   title = {Emerging doctrine of deference of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?},
   url = {https://is.muni.cz/publication/1497030/cs/Emerging-doctrine-of-deference-of-the-Inter-American-Court-of-Human-Rights/Tsereteli?vysledek=24913},
   volume = {20},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1497030
AU  - Tsereteli, Nino
PY  - 2016
TI  - Emerging doctrine of deference of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?
JF  - International journal of human rights
VL  - 20
IS  - 8
SP  - 1097-1112
EP  - 1097-1112
SN  - 13642987
KW  - Inter-American Court of Human Rights
KW  - deference
KW  - subsidiarity
KW  - legitimacy
UR  - https://is.muni.cz/publication/1497030/cs/Emerging-doctrine-of-deference-of-the-Inter-American-Court-of-Human-Rights/Tsereteli?vysledek=24913
L2  - https://is.muni.cz/publication/1497030/cs/Emerging-doctrine-of-deference-of-the-Inter-American-Court-of-Human-Rights/Tsereteli?vysledek=24913
N2  - In its early days, almost all cases examined by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ( IACtHR) involved acts of state violence. Deference to national decision-makers was out of the question, due to their manifest lack of willingness and/or ability to deliver on human rights promises. A partial shift of focus away from such cases, due to the change in a legal and political landscape, created the need for the IACtHR to reconsider its relationship with national jurisdictions and become more deferential. This would enable the IACtHR to ensure conformity of its approach with its subsidiary role and strengthen its legitimacy and effectiveness. This article reflects on how deference does and should operate at each of the two stages of judicial reasoning, norm interpretation and norm application. It asks: does the IACtHR exercise deference? Should it exercise deference? If so, with regard to what, under what conditions and to what extent? As regards norm interpretation, the article suggests ways of adopting a middle ground between overreliance on national interpretations to the detriment of individuals and complete disregard of those interpretations at the risk of antagonising states. As regards norm application, it suggests that some of the recent judgments signalled the willingness of the IACtHR to exercise deference (refusing to impose its determination of consequences that should follow from the treaty norms in the given situation) and calls for a clear articulation of conditions and the extent of deference.
ER  -

TSERETELI, Nino. Emerging doctrine of deference of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights? \textit{International journal of human rights}. 2016, roč.~20, č.~8, s.~1097-1112. ISSN~1364-2987. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1254875.

Přehled o publikaci