Rehabilitation or risk aversion? Banning supporters from
sporting events in the Czech Republic

J 2019

Rehabilitation or risk aversion? Banning supporters from sporting events in the Czech Republic

DIVIŠOVÁ, Vendula

Základní údaje

Originální název

Rehabilitation or risk aversion? Banning supporters from sporting events in the Czech Republic

Autoři

DIVIŠOVÁ, Vendula

Vydání

Sport in Society, Abingdon, Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2019, 1743-0437

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.939

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/19:00109204

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

Banning orders; sportrelated violence; football hooliganism; crime control; punishment

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 27. 4. 2020 15:10, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

Drawing comparisons with most European countries, the Czech ‘counter-hooligan’ policy seems like an exception. Despite occasional outbursts of securitising discourse emphasising an urgent need to eradicate violent incidents in the stadiums, we can hardly talk about a legal specificity of the phenomenon in the country. Undesirable behaviour related to sporting events is countered by existing criminal law provisions including court banning orders inspired by the English example. It is suggested that to evaluate the alleged ‘Czech exceptionality’, more thorough investigation of the everyday discourse and practices of the criminal justice and crime control agencies is needed. Based on judgments analysis, this article exposes a significant inconsistency in how courts apply and justify banning orders. It concludes that, to a lesser extent, we can identify a risk-oriented approach in the courts’ reasoning and after all, sport-related offences are considered as a special case of offensiveness as well in the Czech Republic.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1117/2018, interní kód MU

Název: Aktuální problémy politologického výzkumu V.

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Aktuální problémy politologického výzkumu V., DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Přiložené soubory

Rehabilitation_or_risk_aversion_Banning_supporters_from_sporting_events_in_the_Czech_Republic.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

DIVIŠOVÁ, Vendula. Rehabilitation or risk aversion? Banning supporters from sporting events in the Czech Republic. Sport in Society. Abingdon: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2019, roč. 22, č. 12, s. 2224-2242. ISSN 1743-0437. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1568411.

@article{1501657,
   author = {Divišová, Vendula},
   article_location = {Abingdon},
   article_number = {12},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1568411},
   keywords = {Banning orders; sportrelated violence; football hooliganism; crime control; punishment},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1743-0437},
   journal = {Sport in Society},
   title = {Rehabilitation or risk aversion? Banning supporters from sporting events in the Czech Republic},
   url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17430437.2019.1568411},
   volume = {22},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1501657
AU  - Divišová, Vendula
PY  - 2019
TI  - Rehabilitation or risk aversion? Banning supporters from sporting events in the Czech Republic
JF  - Sport in Society
VL  - 22
IS  - 12
SP  - 2224-2242
EP  - 2224-2242
PB  - Routledge, Taylor & Francis
SN  - 17430437
KW  - Banning orders
KW  - sportrelated violence
KW  - football hooliganism
KW  - crime control
KW  - punishment
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17430437.2019.1568411
L2  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17430437.2019.1568411
N2  - Drawing comparisons with most European countries, the Czech ‘counter-hooligan’ policy seems like an exception. Despite occasional outbursts of securitising discourse emphasising an urgent need to eradicate violent incidents in the stadiums, we can hardly talk about a legal specificity of the phenomenon in the country. Undesirable behaviour related to sporting events is countered by existing criminal law provisions including court banning orders inspired by the English example. It is suggested that to evaluate the alleged ‘Czech exceptionality’, more thorough investigation of the everyday discourse and practices of the criminal justice and crime control agencies is needed. Based on judgments analysis, this article exposes a significant inconsistency in how courts apply and justify banning orders. It concludes that, to a lesser extent, we can identify a risk-oriented approach in the courts’ reasoning and after all, sport-related offences are considered as a special case of offensiveness as well in the Czech Republic.
ER  -

DIVIŠOVÁ, Vendula. Rehabilitation or risk aversion? Banning supporters from sporting events in the Czech Republic. \textit{Sport in Society}. Abingdon: Routledge, Taylor \&{} Francis, 2019, roč.~22, č.~12, s.~2224-2242. ISSN~1743-0437. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1568411.

Přehled o publikaci