2019
Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies
LANG, Martin, Benjamin G PURZYCKI, Coren L APICELLA, Quentin D ATKINSON, Alexander BOLYANATZ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies
Autoři
LANG, Martin (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Benjamin G PURZYCKI, Coren L APICELLA, Quentin D ATKINSON, Alexander BOLYANATZ, Emma COHEN, Carla HANDLEY, Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Carolyn LESOROGOL, Sarah MATHEW, Rita A MCNAMARA, Cristina MOYA, Caitlyn D PLACEK, Montserrat SOLER, Thomas VARDY, Jonathan L WEIGEL, Aiyana K WILLARD, Dimitris XYGALATAS, Ara NORENZAYAN a Joseph HENRICH
Vydání
Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, The Royal Society Publishing, 2019, 0962-8452
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
60304 Religious studies
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.638
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/19:00109241
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
UT WoS
000465433600014
Klíčová slova anglicky
impartiality; parochialism; supernatural punishment; cultural evolution; religion; punishing gods
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 5. 2020 11:11, Mgr. Zuzana Matulíková
Anotace
V originále
The emergence of large-scale cooperation during the Holocene remains a central problem in the evolutionary literature. One hypothesis points to culturally evolved beliefs in punishing, interventionist gods that facilitate the extension of cooperative behaviour toward geographically distant co-religionists. Furthermore, another hypothesis points to such mechanisms being constrained to the religious ingroup, possibly at the expense of religious outgroups. To test these hypotheses, we administered two behavioural experiments and a set of interviews to a sample of 2228 participants from 15 diverse populations. These populations included foragers, pastoralists, horticulturalists, and wage labourers, practicing Buddhism, Christianity, and Hinduism, but also forms of animism and ancestor worship. Using the Random Allocation Game (RAG) and the Dictator Game (DG) in which individuals allocated money between themselves, local and geographically distant co-religionists, and religious outgroups, we found that higher ratings of gods as monitoring and punishing predicted decreased local favouritism (RAGs) and increased resource-sharing with distant co-religionists (DGs). The effects of punishing and monitoring gods on outgroup allocations revealed between-site variability, suggesting that in the absence of intergroup hostility, moralizing gods may be implicated in cooperative behaviour toward outgroups. These results provide support for the hypothesis that beliefs in monitoring and punitive gods help expand the circle of sustainable social interaction, and open questions about the treatment of religious outgroups.
Návaznosti
EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaV |
|