J 2019

Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies

LANG, Martin, Benjamin G PURZYCKI, Coren L APICELLA, Quentin D ATKINSON, Alexander BOLYANATZ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies

Autoři

LANG, Martin (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Benjamin G PURZYCKI, Coren L APICELLA, Quentin D ATKINSON, Alexander BOLYANATZ, Emma COHEN, Carla HANDLEY, Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Carolyn LESOROGOL, Sarah MATHEW, Rita A MCNAMARA, Cristina MOYA, Caitlyn D PLACEK, Montserrat SOLER, Thomas VARDY, Jonathan L WEIGEL, Aiyana K WILLARD, Dimitris XYGALATAS, Ara NORENZAYAN a Joseph HENRICH

Vydání

Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, The Royal Society Publishing, 2019, 0962-8452

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

60304 Religious studies

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.638

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/19:00109241

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

UT WoS

000465433600014

Klíčová slova anglicky

impartiality; parochialism; supernatural punishment; cultural evolution; religion; punishing gods

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 5. 2020 11:11, Mgr. Zuzana Matulíková

Anotace

V originále

The emergence of large-scale cooperation during the Holocene remains a central problem in the evolutionary literature. One hypothesis points to culturally evolved beliefs in punishing, interventionist gods that facilitate the extension of cooperative behaviour toward geographically distant co-religionists. Furthermore, another hypothesis points to such mechanisms being constrained to the religious ingroup, possibly at the expense of religious outgroups. To test these hypotheses, we administered two behavioural experiments and a set of interviews to a sample of 2228 participants from 15 diverse populations. These populations included foragers, pastoralists, horticulturalists, and wage labourers, practicing Buddhism, Christianity, and Hinduism, but also forms of animism and ancestor worship. Using the Random Allocation Game (RAG) and the Dictator Game (DG) in which individuals allocated money between themselves, local and geographically distant co-religionists, and religious outgroups, we found that higher ratings of gods as monitoring and punishing predicted decreased local favouritism (RAGs) and increased resource-sharing with distant co-religionists (DGs). The effects of punishing and monitoring gods on outgroup allocations revealed between-site variability, suggesting that in the absence of intergroup hostility, moralizing gods may be implicated in cooperative behaviour toward outgroups. These results provide support for the hypothesis that beliefs in monitoring and punitive gods help expand the circle of sustainable social interaction, and open questions about the treatment of religious outgroups.

Návaznosti

EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaV
Název: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství