a 2018

Comparative phylogenetic analysis of Apicomplexa based on 18s, 28s and contig 18s+28s rDNA

DIAKIN, Andrei, Timur G. SIMDYANOV a Andrea BARDŮNEK VALIGUROVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Comparative phylogenetic analysis of Apicomplexa based on 18s, 28s and contig 18s+28s rDNA

Autoři

DIAKIN, Andrei (643 Rusko, garant, domácí), Timur G. SIMDYANOV (643 Rusko) a Andrea BARDŮNEK VALIGUROVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí)

Vydání

7th Workshop of European Centre of Ichthyoparasitology, 2018

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Konferenční abstrakt

Obor

10613 Zoology

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/18:00101821

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

Apicomplexa; gregariny; protokokcidie; agamokokcidie; fylogeneze

Klíčová slova anglicky

Apicomplexa; gregarines; protococcidia; agamococcidia; phylogeny
Změněno: 19. 4. 2019 14:53, doc. RNDr. Andrea Bardůnek Valigurová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Apicomplexans form a large and diverse group of unicellular parasites inhabiting invertebrates and vertebrates. Some of them are responsible for important human and animal diseases (e.g. Plasmodium spp., Toxoplasma gondii, and Cryptosporidium spp.), therefore are intensively studied in various aspects of biology and medicine. However, basal groups (e.g. gregarines, agamococcidia, blastogregarines, and protococcidia) that are restricted to invertebrate hosts remain poorly understood. There are a lot of investigations dedicated to intraspecies (relationship between different strains) and intragenus phylogenetic relationships of aforementioned pathogens. Less investigations concern molecular phylogeny of other apicomplexan groups, and even less are dedicated to phylogeny of Apicomplexa as whole. We performed comparative analysis of several phylogenetic trees: 1. 18s that include large most available taxa; 2. 18s tree with reduced number of taxa (the taxa were selected based on 28s set of sequences; 3. 28s phylogenetic tree; 4. 18s+28s phylogenetic trees. Large 18s tree fits to a modern view on presence of the main groups of Apicomplexa, however, as expected, ordering and supports are variously depending on selected analysis. Reduced 18s tree shows another picture: despite the presence of main clades, some species jumped to the other clades; other point is that the ordering does not fit to a large 18s tree. 28s and 18s+28s trees show almost the same results to each other and to 18s tree with a large number of taxa, with flipping of some clades, however. Other consequences is the increasing of clades supports.We can conclude that for better understanding of evolutionary pathways we need to process more data. In addition the use of multigene analysis would improve the results of analysis and data interpretation.

Návaznosti

GBP505/12/G112, projekt VaV
Název: ECIP - Evropské centrum ichtyoparazitologie
Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, ECIP - Evropské centrum ichtyoparazitologie