| SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL, David HEJČ and Radislav BRAŽINA. Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic. Central European Public Administration Review. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 2019, vol. 17, No 1, p. 43-68. ISSN 2591-2240. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1527739,
author = {Skulová, Soňa and Potěšil, Lukáš and Hejč, David and Bražina, Radislav},
article_location = {Ljubljana},
article_number = {1},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03},
keywords = {administrative silence; administrative justice; constitutional court; effectiveness; judicial protection},
language = {eng},
issn = {2591-2240},
journal = {Central European Public Administration Review},
title = {Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic},
url = {http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455},
volume = {17},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1527739
AU - Skulová, Soňa - Potěšil, Lukáš - Hejč, David - Bražina, Radislav
PY - 2019
TI - Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic
JF - Central European Public Administration Review
VL - 17
IS - 1
SP - 43-68
EP - 43-68
PB - University of Ljubljana
SN - 25912240
KW - administrative silence
KW - administrative justice
KW - constitutional court
KW - effectiveness
KW - judicial protection
UR - http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455
L2 - http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455
N2 - This paper is devoted to the issue of judicial protection in case of (or against) administrative silence (inactivity) and its effectiveness on the case study of the Czech Republic. The aim of judicial protection again-st administrative silence is to help solving or terminating administrati-ve silence quickly, otherwise, an imaginary vicious circle is created. The purpose of the paper is to verify whether judicial protection is indeed effective by surveying the related legislation and court practice (especi-ally the length of proceedings) dealing with the so-called inactivity. The methods of analysis applied are normative analysis, literature review, sta-tistical analysis of decision-making activities of courts and deduction. Our findings establish that due to the excessive length of court proceedings and incomprehensible legal regulation it is difficult to view the judicial protection against administrative silence as being a speedy and effecti-ve instrument of remediation of inactivity on the part of administrative authorities. The results can serve as a ground to compare the situation with other similar countries and to exchange best practices.
ER -
SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL, David HEJČ and Radislav BRAŽINA. Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic. \textit{Central European Public Administration Review}. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 2019, vol.~17, No~1, p.~43-68. ISSN~2591-2240. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03.
|
