SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL, David HEJČ a Radislav BRAŽINA. Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic. Central European Public Administration Review. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 2019, roč. 17, č. 1, s. 43-68. ISSN 2591-2240. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03. |
Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1527739, author = {Skulová, Soňa and Potěšil, Lukáš and Hejč, David and Bražina, Radislav}, article_location = {Ljubljana}, article_number = {1}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03}, keywords = {administrative silence; administrative justice; constitutional court; effectiveness; judicial protection}, language = {eng}, issn = {2591-2240}, journal = {Central European Public Administration Review}, title = {Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic}, url = {http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455}, volume = {17}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1527739 AU - Skulová, Soňa - Potěšil, Lukáš - Hejč, David - Bražina, Radislav PY - 2019 TI - Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic JF - Central European Public Administration Review VL - 17 IS - 1 SP - 43-68 EP - 43-68 PB - University of Ljubljana SN - 25912240 KW - administrative silence KW - administrative justice KW - constitutional court KW - effectiveness KW - judicial protection UR - http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455 L2 - http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455 N2 - This paper is devoted to the issue of judicial protection in case of (or against) administrative silence (inactivity) and its effectiveness on the case study of the Czech Republic. The aim of judicial protection again-st administrative silence is to help solving or terminating administrati-ve silence quickly, otherwise, an imaginary vicious circle is created. The purpose of the paper is to verify whether judicial protection is indeed effective by surveying the related legislation and court practice (especi-ally the length of proceedings) dealing with the so-called inactivity. The methods of analysis applied are normative analysis, literature review, sta-tistical analysis of decision-making activities of courts and deduction. Our findings establish that due to the excessive length of court proceedings and incomprehensible legal regulation it is difficult to view the judicial protection against administrative silence as being a speedy and effecti-ve instrument of remediation of inactivity on the part of administrative authorities. The results can serve as a ground to compare the situation with other similar countries and to exchange best practices. ER -
SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL, David HEJČ a Radislav BRAŽINA. Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic. \textit{Central European Public Administration Review}. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 2019, roč.~17, č.~1, s.~43-68. ISSN~2591-2240. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03.
|