Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@proceedings{1530797,
author = {Špelda, Daniel},
booktitle = {Experience and reasoning in scientific methodology: between antiquity and the early modern period, Prague},
keywords = {cartesianism; methodology; shoe; early modern philosophy and science},
language = {eng},
title = {Hypotheses fingimus: Cartesian Natural Philosophy between Rationalism and Empiricism},
year = {2019}
}
TY - CONF
ID - 1530797
AU - Špelda, Daniel
PY - 2019
TI - Hypotheses fingimus: Cartesian Natural Philosophy between Rationalism and Empiricism
KW - cartesianism
KW - methodology
KW - shoe
KW - early modern philosophy and science
N2 - In my contribution, I want to deal with the two texts from the context of the Cartesian school: J. Rohault, Traité de physique (1671) and P.-S. Régis, Système de philosophie (1690). I want to focus on the way the Cartesians evaluated the methodology of ancient natural philosophy (especially Aristotle’s) and the problem of using empirical and speculative procedures in Cartesian physics and astronomy. I chose the most important passages from Rohault's "Préface" to Traité de physique (section on four sources of errors) and Chapter III from the first book, which is generally methodological. From Régis’ Système, I chose a methodological preface to the physical part of the work, which is extremely enlightening for everyone who wants to understand the methodology of Cartesian natural philosophy.
ER -
ŠPELDA, Daniel. Hypotheses fingimus: Cartesian Natural Philosophy between Rationalism and Empiricism. In \textit{Experience and reasoning in scientific methodology: between antiquity and the early modern period, Prague}. 2019.
|
