2019
Differences between young architects' and non-architects' aesthetic evaluation of buildings
ŠAFÁROVÁ, Katarína, Martin PÍRKO, Vojtěch JUŘÍK, Tomáš PAVLICA, Ondřej NÉMETH et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Differences between young architects' and non-architects' aesthetic evaluation of buildings
Autoři
ŠAFÁROVÁ, Katarína (703 Slovensko, garant, domácí), Martin PÍRKO (203 Česká republika, domácí), Vojtěch JUŘÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Tomáš PAVLICA (203 Česká republika) a Ondřej NÉMETH (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Frontiers of architectural research, 2019, 2095-2635
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50103 Cognitive sciences
Stát vydavatele
Čína
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/19:00110223
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
UT WoS
000475491600009
Klíčová slova anglicky
Aesthetic preferences; Building aesthetics; Environmental aesthetics; Environmental apperception; Professional opinion shift
Štítky
Změněno: 20. 9. 2020 21:42, Mgr. Vojtěch Juřík, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Previous studies showed significant differences between expert architects and laypeople in aesthetic evaluations of buildings. However, studies exploring the aesthetic preferences of architecture students are lacking. The present study focused on a population of students and young architects to explore the aesthetic opinion shift within architectural careers. This study was intended to be a conceptual replication of the study of Brown and Gifford (2001) in a Central European context. A total of 109 participants (21–28 years old) evaluated 40 randomized pictures of houses to detect whether non-architecture undergraduates and fresh graduates of architecture would express different aesthetic preferences compared with their peers from the general population. The study also examined whether laypersons can predict the preferences of architects, and vice versa. Results show a trend that is contrary to the original research, that is, young architects and laypeople did not significantly differ in their aesthetic evaluations of the given stimuli. Analyses revealed high prediction ability in young architects and their non-architect peers. Moreover, the existing professional experience of young architects had no influence on the accuracy of their estimations. Findings suggest that the professional shift in architects’ expertise is obscured at an early career stage, as revealed in their aesthetic preferences.