European discourse : what difference does it make in the
national coordination of the European agenda?

J 2020

European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?

GALUŠKOVÁ, Johana a Petr KANIOK

Základní údaje

Originální název

European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?

Autoři

GALUŠKOVÁ, Johana (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Petr KANIOK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

European Politics and Society, London, Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis, 2020, 2374-5118

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50601 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL URL

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/20:00113980

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127

Klíčová slova anglicky

Discursive institutionalism; European communicative discourse; EU coordination systems; centralization; decentralization; Czech Republic

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 3. 3. 2021 14:49, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

Coordination systems of the European agenda in EU Member states have been mostly examined thought three traditional neo-institutional approaches. Historical, rational choice and sociological institutional approaches greatly vary in explaining what causes changes in EU affairs coordination structures. We propose that such disagreement is caused by their focus on exogenous static changes, not paying sufficient attention to the role that daily communication of EU affairs may have on the way they are coordinated. Our article fills this gap by analysing the impact of communicative discourse of EU issues in the Czech Republic. Using discursive institutionalism as a point of departure and using critical discursive analysis, we found that the case of a coalition with pro-European discourse did not confirm the expectations about the decentralization of coordination system. On the contrary, the coordination system moved back towards a centralized system.

Návaznosti

GA18-05612S, projekt VaV

Název: Sjednoceni v rozdílech; Příspěvek zemí Visegrádu k tématu vícerychlostní integrace Evropské unie

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Sjednoceni v rozdílech; Příspěvek zemí Visegrádu k tématu vícerychlostní integrace Evropské unie

MUNI/A/1025/2018, interní kód MU

Název: Perspektivy evropské integrace v kontextu globální politiky

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Perspektivy evropské integrace v kontextu globální politiky, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Přiložené soubory

European_discourse_Galuskova_Kaniok.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

GALUŠKOVÁ, Johana a Petr KANIOK. European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda? European Politics and Society. London: Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis, 2020, roč. 21, č. 4, s. 399-417. ISSN 2374-5118. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127.

@article{1550512,
   author = {Galušková, Johana and Kaniok, Petr},
   article_location = {London},
   article_number = {4},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127},
   keywords = {Discursive institutionalism; European communicative discourse; EU coordination systems; centralization; decentralization; Czech Republic},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2374-5118},
   journal = {European Politics and Society},
   title = {European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127},
   volume = {21},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1550512
AU  - Galušková, Johana - Kaniok, Petr
PY  - 2020
TI  - European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?
JF  - European Politics and Society
VL  - 21
IS  - 4
SP  - 399-417
EP  - 399-417
PB  - Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis
SN  - 23745118
KW  - Discursive institutionalism
KW  - European communicative discourse
KW  - EU coordination systems
KW  - centralization
KW  - decentralization
KW  - Czech Republic
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127
N2  - Coordination systems of the European agenda in EU Member states have been mostly examined thought three traditional neo-institutional approaches. Historical, rational choice and sociological institutional approaches greatly vary in explaining what causes changes in EU affairs coordination structures. We propose that such disagreement is caused by their focus on exogenous static changes, not paying sufficient attention to the role that daily communication of EU affairs may have on the way they are coordinated. Our article fills this gap by analysing the impact of communicative discourse of EU issues in the Czech Republic. Using discursive institutionalism as a point of departure and using critical discursive analysis, we found that the case of a coalition with pro-European discourse did not confirm the expectations about the decentralization of coordination system. On the contrary, the coordination system moved back towards a centralized system.
ER  -

GALUŠKOVÁ, Johana a Petr KANIOK. European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda? \textit{European Politics and Society}. London: Routledge Journals, Taylor \&{} Francis, 2020, roč.~21, č.~4, s.~399-417. ISSN~2374-5118. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci