Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1569836,
author = {Voska, Michal and Zavoral, Miroslav and Grega, Tomas and Májek, Ondřej and Martinek, Jan and Tacheci, Ilja and Benes, Marek and Vojtechova, Gabriela and Drastich, Pavel and Bures, Jan and Spicak, Julius and Bučková, Barbora and Ngo, Ondřej and Suchanek, Stepan},
article_location = {New York},
article_number = {SEP 3 2019},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438},
keywords = {Colon Capsule Endoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasia Detection; Screening},
language = {eng},
issn = {1687-6121},
journal = {Gastroenterology Research and Practice},
title = {Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438},
volume = {2019},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1569836
AU - Voska, Michal - Zavoral, Miroslav - Grega, Tomas - Májek, Ondřej - Martinek, Jan - Tacheci, Ilja - Benes, Marek - Vojtechova, Gabriela - Drastich, Pavel - Bures, Jan - Spicak, Julius - Bučková, Barbora - Ngo, Ondřej - Suchanek, Stepan
PY - 2019
TI - Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
JF - Gastroenterology Research and Practice
VL - 2019
IS - SEP 3 2019
SP - 1-8
EP - 1-8
PB - Hindawi Publishing Corporation
SN - 16876121
KW - Colon Capsule Endoscopy
KW - Colorectal Neoplasia Detection
KW - Screening
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438
L2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438
N2 - Backround. Capsule colonoscopy might present an alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia screening. Aim. To assess the accuracy of second-generation capsule colonoscopy (CCE2) for colorectal neoplasia detection compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). Methods. From 2011-2015, we performed a multicenter, prospective, cross-over study evaluating the use of CCE2 as a possible colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test based on the assessment of the method's characteristics (accuracy) and safety and patient acceptance of the routine. Enrolled participants fulfilled the CRC screening population criteria if they were asymptomatic, were older than 50, and had no personal or familial history of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was accuracy for the detection of polyps >= 6 mm. Secondary outcomes were accuracy for all polyps, polyps >= 10 mm, adenomas >= 10 mm, and cancers, the quality of bowel cleansing, safety, and CCE2 acceptability by the screening population. Results. A total of 236 individuals were examined; 11 patients (5%) were excluded. Therefore, 225 subjects (95%) were considered in the intention-to-screen (ITS) group. A total of 201 patients (89%) completed both examinations successfully (per protocol group). In the ITS group, polyps were diagnosed during CC in 114 subjects (51%); polyps >= 6 mm, polyps >= 10 mm, and adenomas >= 10 mm were diagnosed in 34 (15%), 16 (7%), and 11 (5%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity of CCE2 for polyps >= 6 mm, polyps >= 10 mm, and adenomas >= 10 mm was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62-91%), 88% (95% CI: 62-98%), and 100% (95% CI: 72-100%), respectively. Conclusion. Second-generation capsule colonoscopy is a safe, noninvasive, and sensitive method for colorectal neoplasia detection although CC remains the preferred method for considerable proportion of subjects. CCE2 may therefore be accepted as the primary screening test for colorectal cancer screening.
ER -
VOSKA, Michal, Miroslav ZAVORAL, Tomas GREGA, Ondřej MÁJEK, Jan MARTINEK, Ilja TACHECI, Marek BENES, Gabriela VOJTECHOVA, Pavel DRASTICH, Jan BURES, Julius SPICAK, Barbora BUČKOVÁ, Ondřej NGO and Stepan SUCHANEK. Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy. \textit{Gastroenterology Research and Practice}. New York: Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2019, vol.~2019, SEP 3 2019, p.~1-8. ISSN~1687-6121. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5975438.
|
