The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg
System of Human Rights

C 2019

The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights

KOSAŘ, David a Jan PETROV

Základní údaje

Originální název

The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Jan PETROV (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

1. vyd. Oxford, How International Law Works in Times of Crisis, od s. 255-271, 17 s. European Society of International Law, 2019

Nakladatel

Oxford University Press

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

Web nakladatele Repozitář MU

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/19:00113990

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISBN

978-0-19-884966-7

Klíčová slova anglicky

European Convention on Human Rights; European Court of Human Rights; compliance with international law; implementation of international judicial decisions; application of ECHR by domestic courts

Štítky

topvydavatel

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 16. 12. 2020 11:41, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The Strasbourg system of human rights has been going through a backlog, legitimacy and implementation crisis during the past decade. Debates addressing the future of the ECHR system and seeking answers to those challenges have concentrated on the domestic level of the Strasbourg system. This chapter concurs that the domestic actors, and the domestic judiciary in particular, are essential for the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Strasbourg system since they “diffuse” the ECtHR’s conclusions domestically and subsequently “filter” the human rights claims. However, the chapter seeks a more nuanced approach to the role of domestic courts in the architecture of the ECHR system. It problematizes the contribution of domestic courts to the ECHR’s effectiveness on three accounts. First, courts are not the sole actors involved in domestic implementation mechanisms. The judiciary enters into multiple interactions with other domestic actors and is not necessarily always victorious. Second, there are several actors within the judiciary who may have different attitudes to the ECtHR such as the constitutional court, apex courts, lower courts, court presidents and judicial associations. Thrid, not all those actors unequivocally support implementation of Strasbourg case law and some of them have shown considerable resistance to the ECtHR. These insights should provide a more nuanced basis for addressing the future of the ECHR system.

Návaznosti

GA16-09415S, projekt VaV

Název: Beyond Compliance - Implementace rozhodnutí mezinárodních lidskoprávních těles na národní úrovni

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Beyond Compliance - Implementace rozhodnutí mezinárodních lidskoprávních těles na národní úrovni

Přiložené soubory

20201216113518469.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David a Jan PETROV. The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights. In George Ulrich a Ineta Ziemele. How International Law Works in Times of Crisis. 1. vyd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, s. 255-271. European Society of International Law. ISBN 978-0-19-884966-7.

@inbook{1574721,
   author = {Kosař, David and Petrov, Jan},
   address = {Oxford},
   booktitle = {How International Law Works in Times of Crisis},
   edition = {1},
   editor = {George Ulrich a Ineta Ziemele},
   keywords = {European Convention on Human Rights; European Court of Human Rights; compliance with international law; implementation of international judicial decisions; application of ECHR by domestic courts},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Oxford},
   isbn = {978-0-19-884966-7},
   pages = {255-271},
   publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   title = {The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights},
   url = {https://global.oup.com/academic/product/how-international-law-works-in-times-of-crisis-9780198849667?cc=cz&lang=en&#},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1574721
AU  - Kosař, David - Petrov, Jan
PY  - 2019
TI  - The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights
VL  - European Society of International Law
PB  - Oxford University Press
CY  - Oxford
SN  - 9780198849667
KW  - European Convention on Human Rights
KW  - European Court of Human Rights
KW  - compliance with international law
KW  - implementation of international judicial decisions
KW  - application of ECHR by domestic courts
UR  - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/how-international-law-works-in-times-of-crisis-9780198849667?cc=cz&lang=en&#
L2  - https://is.muni.cz/publication/1574721/cs/The-Domestic-Judiciary-in-the-Architecture-of-the-Strasbourg-System-of-Human-Rights/Kosar-Petrov?vysledek=94274
N2  - The Strasbourg system of human rights has been going through a backlog, legitimacy and implementation crisis during the past decade. Debates addressing the future of the ECHR system and seeking answers to those challenges have concentrated on the domestic level of the Strasbourg system. This chapter concurs that the domestic actors, and the domestic judiciary in particular, are essential for the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Strasbourg system since they “diffuse” the ECtHR’s conclusions domestically and subsequently “filter” the human rights claims. However, the chapter seeks a more nuanced approach to the role of domestic courts in the architecture of the ECHR system. It problematizes the contribution of domestic courts to the ECHR’s effectiveness on three accounts. First, courts are not the sole actors involved in domestic implementation mechanisms. The judiciary enters into multiple interactions with other domestic actors and is not necessarily always victorious. Second, there are several actors within the judiciary who may have different attitudes to the ECtHR such as the constitutional court, apex courts, lower courts, court presidents and judicial associations. Thrid, not all those actors unequivocally support implementation of Strasbourg case law and some of them have shown considerable resistance to the ECtHR. These insights should provide a more nuanced basis for addressing the future of the ECHR system.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David a Jan PETROV. The Domestic Judiciary in the Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights. In George Ulrich a Ineta Ziemele. \textit{How International Law Works in Times of Crisis}. 1. vyd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, s.~255-271. European Society of International Law. ISBN~978-0-19-884966-7.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci