2019
Archetype analysis in sustainability research : meanings, motivations, and evidence-based policy making
OBERLACK, Christoph, Diana SIETZ, Elisabeth Bürgi BONANOMI, Ariane de BREMOND, Jampel DELL'ANGELO et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Archetype analysis in sustainability research : meanings, motivations, and evidence-based policy making
Autoři
OBERLACK, Christoph (756 Švýcarsko), Diana SIETZ (276 Německo), Elisabeth Bürgi BONANOMI (756 Švýcarsko), Ariane de BREMOND (756 Švýcarsko), Jampel DELL'ANGELO (528 Nizozemské království), Klaus EISENACK (276 Německo), Erle C ELLIS (840 Spojené státy), Graham EPSTEIN (124 Kanada), Markus GIGER (756 Švýcarsko), Andreas HEINIMANN (756 Švýcarsko), Christian KIMMICH (276 Německo, garant, domácí), Marcel TJ KOK (528 Nizozemské království), David MANUEL-NAVARRETE (840 Spojené státy), Peter MESSERLI (756 Švýcarsko), Patrick MEYFROIDT (56 Belgie), Tomáš VÁCLAVÍK (203 Česká republika) a Sergio VILLAMAYOR-TOMAS (724 Španělsko)
Vydání
Ecology and Society, Wolfville, Resilience Alliance, 2019, 1708-3087
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50704 Environmental sciences
Stát vydavatele
Kanada
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.890
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/19:00111513
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
UT WoS
000482712400008
Klíčová slova anglicky
archetype; land systems; social-ecological system; sustainability; vulnerability
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 3. 2020 14:27, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
Anotace
V originále
Archetypes are increasingly used as a methodological approach to understand recurrent patterns in variables and processes that shape the sustainability of social-ecological systems. The rapid growth and diversification of archetype analyses has generated variations, inconsistencies, and confusion about the meanings, potential, and limitations of archetypes. Based on a systematic review, a survey, and a workshop series, we provide a consolidated perspective on the core features and diverse meanings of archetype analysis in sustainability research, the motivations behind it, and its policy relevance. We identify three core features of archetype analysis: recurrent patterns, multiple models, and intermediate abstraction. Two gradients help to apprehend the variety of meanings of archetype analysis that sustainability researchers have developed: (1) understanding archetypes as building blocks or as case typologies and (2) using archetypes for pattern recognition, diagnosis, or scenario development. We demonstrate how archetype analysis has been used to synthesize results from case studies, bridge the gap between global narratives and local realities, foster methodological interplay, and transfer knowledge about sustainability strategies across cases. We also critically examine the potential and limitations of archetype analysis in supporting evidence-based policy making through context-sensitive generalizations with case-level empirical validity. Finally, we identify future priorities, with a view to leveraging the full potential of archetype analysis for supporting sustainable development.