OCELÍK, Petr, Kamila SVOBODOVÁ, Markéta HENDRYCHOVÁ, Lukáš LEHOTSKÝ, Jo-Anne EVERINGHAM, Saleem ALI, Jaroslaw BADERA and Alex LECHNER. A contested transition toward a coal-free future : Advocacy coalitions and coal policy in the Czech Republic. Energy Research & Social Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019, vol. 58, December, p. 1-13. ISSN 2214-6296. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101283.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name A contested transition toward a coal-free future : Advocacy coalitions and coal policy in the Czech Republic
Authors OCELÍK, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Kamila SVOBODOVÁ (36 Australia), Markéta HENDRYCHOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Lukáš LEHOTSKÝ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Jo-Anne EVERINGHAM (36 Australia), Saleem ALI (36 Australia), Jaroslaw BADERA (616 Poland) and Alex LECHNER (458 Malaysia).
Edition Energy Research & Social Science, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2019, 2214-6296.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50601 Political science
Country of publisher Netherlands
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 4.771
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14230/19:00112210
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101283
UT WoS 000498882200001
Keywords in English Energy policy; Energy transition; Coal phase-out; Policy networks
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Blanka Farkašová, učo 97333. Changed: 24/3/2020 16:06.
Abstract
Coal phase-out is an integral part of the ongoing energy transition to a decarbonized economy. Any such process involves diverse actors that compete over the nature and pace of such transition. This research uses the Advocacy Coalition Framework to analyze the conditions of policy change within an adversarial subsystem. It focuses on the coal subsystem in the Czech Republic, a post-communist coal-dependent country with comparatively large economically recoverable reserves. Using data from an organizational survey, exploratory social network analysis techniques are applied to identify advocacy coalitions and deductive block-modeling is used to test hypotheses on the subsystem’s functioning. The focus is on: (1) fragmentation of decision-makers, (2) targeting of decision-makers, and (3) use of expert information. Two competing and ideologically distant coalitions were identified: the Industry Coalition and Environmental Coalition. The results further show high fragmentation among decision-makers, as indicated by their cross-coalition membership and the heterogeneity of their beliefs. The targeting of decision-makers is practiced by principal members of both coalitions, i.e. environmental non-governmental organizations and industry, but also by research organizations. Lastly, expert information exchange strongly overlaps with the identified coalitions and thus increases their cohesiveness. It is argued that such subsystem configuration limits the potential for policy change through negotiated agreement or policy learning. Policy brokers and policy venues are suggested as remedies to moderate the adversarial nature of the subsystem.
PrintDisplayed: 22/9/2024 15:37