2019
Accuracy of PCR and serological testing for the diagnosis of primary syphilis: Both tests are necessary
NODA, Angel A.; Islay RODRIGUEZ; Linda GRILLOVÁ; Philipp P. BOSSHARD; Reto LIENHARD et. al.Basic information
Original name
Accuracy of PCR and serological testing for the diagnosis of primary syphilis: Both tests are necessary
Authors
NODA, Angel A. (192 Cuba, guarantor); Islay RODRIGUEZ (192 Cuba); Linda GRILLOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); Philipp P. BOSSHARD (756 Switzerland) and Reto LIENHARD (756 Switzerland)
Edition
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, LONDON, SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2019, 0956-4624
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30303 Infectious Diseases
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.406
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112504
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000490799700001
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85073943631
Keywords in English
Syphilis diagnosis; PCR; serology
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 17/1/2020 10:40, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
In the original language
Syphilis, caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum, is a rising global public health concern and laboratory diagnostics remain challenging. Especially during early disease, rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial to ensure patients and their contacts receive timely treatment to eradicate infection and prevent further transmission. In this prospective observational study, we evaluated the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serological testing for the diagnosis of primary syphilis by evaluating anogenital swabs and sera from 178 Cuban patients presenting with ulcers. Three different PCR assays were evaluated targeting polA, tpp47 and 16S rDNA loci. Sera were evaluated with venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and T. pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) assays. Assuming both methods were confirmatory, our data showed that PCR and serology did not correlate well (agreement = 52.3%, kappa 0.0512, 95% CI -0.0928-0.1951, p = 0.496). The sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values of the PCR assays were 76.1%, 100%, 100% and 57.9%, respectively, while the values for serology were 62.5%, 100%, 100% and 45.2%, respectively. The combination of PCR and serology can offer valuable information for the diagnosis of syphilis in patients presenting with anogenital ulceration avoiding further clinical complications and disease transmission.