2019
Cardiac strains as a tool for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-responders: a pilot study
ŠIPULA, David, Milan KOZÁK, Jaroslav SIPULA, Miroslav HOMZA, Jiri PLASEK et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Cardiac strains as a tool for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-responders: a pilot study
Autoři
ŠIPULA, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Milan KOZÁK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jaroslav SIPULA (203 Česká republika), Miroslav HOMZA (203 Česká republika) a Jiri PLASEK (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Open Medicine, Warsaw, Walter De Gruyter, 2019, 2391-5463
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele
Polsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.204
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112594
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000501996200002
Klíčová slova anglicky
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Heart Failure; Optimization; Speckle Tracking; Cardiac Strains
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 20. 1. 2020 07:59, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients. Methods. 30 patients not responding to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators after 3 months were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Atrioventricular interval was adjusted so that E and A waves did not overlap, the interventricular interval was subsequently optimized to yield maximum improvement of the sum of longitudinal+radial+circumferential strains. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA improvement 3 months after optimization were evaluated and use of other strain combinations assessed. Results. A significant correlation between the (combined) strain change and LVEF improvement was detected (p<0.01). 75% of patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure who did not respond to the original CRT-D reacted favorably with significant LVEF and NYHA improvement. The area strain was the best predictor of LVEF/NYHA improvement in those patients. No significant improvement was recorded in patients with ischemic etiology. Conclusions. AV and VV optimization based on speckle tracking is a very promising method potentially leading to a significant improvement of the outcome of CRT-D, especially in patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure.