HULEŠOVÁ, Martina. The Usefulness of the CEFR in the Investigation of Test Versions Content Equivalence. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. Bologna: Filodiritto Publisher, 2018, s. 12-16. ISBN 978-88-85813-21-2.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název The Usefulness of the CEFR in the Investigation of Test Versions Content Equivalence
Autoři HULEŠOVÁ, Martina (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání Bologna, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, od s. 12-16, 5 s. 2018.
Nakladatel Filodiritto Publisher
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Stať ve sborníku
Obor 60202 Specific languages
Stát vydavatele Itálie
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání tištěná verze "print"
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14410/18:00112616
Organizační jednotka Pedagogická fakulta
ISBN 978-88-85813-21-2
ISSN 2420-9619
UT WoS 000471904400001
Klíčová slova anglicky expert judgement; CEFR descriptors; content and construct equivalence; test versions equivalence
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Dana Nesnídalová, učo 831. Změněno: 7. 4. 2020 13:28.
Anotace
This paper presents one part of the PhD research realized within the broader framework of test versions equivalence in high-stakes testing context, particularly in the Slovak upper-secondary school leaving exam in English at B1 level (Maturita). The objectives of the research project are to investigate the extent of equivalence of the test versions used between 2012 and 2015 and, on the basis of the results, to propose what processes could be implemented in the test development with the objective to reach test version equivalence. In this paper, we focus on the use of the CEFR as a tool for the investigation of content and construct equivalence as the Maturita exam claims to be linked to the B1 CEFR level. Content structure analysis using expert judgement and item-descriptor matching method were conducted and the agreement coefficients were calculated. Preliminary findings indicate that CEFR descriptors can be problematic for describing the test content and construct at a discrete, detailed level, as the descriptors differ in terms of completeness, structure and specificity level. The use of CEFR-based descriptive models is also problematized by the fact that the characteristics of test items are seen as the result of the interaction among test takers' proficiency, design of the item, expert judges' characteristics and their internalization of the judgement task. The key findings of the analysis and the usefulness of the CEFR for this purpose will be discussed in light of the whole research project and possible further steps will be presented.
Návaznosti
MUNI/A/0881/2017, interní kód MUNázev: Aktev VII. (Akronym: Aktev VII.)
Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Aktev VII., DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 28. 7. 2024 03:21