2020
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Nadroparin Administration for Thromboprophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients on Vasopressors
CIHLÁŘ, Radek, Vladimír ŠRÁMEK, Adriána PAPIEŽ, Miroslav PENKA, Pavel SUK et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Nadroparin Administration for Thromboprophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients on Vasopressors
Autoři
CIHLÁŘ, Radek (203 Česká republika, domácí), Vladimír ŠRÁMEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Adriána PAPIEŽ (703 Slovensko, domácí), Miroslav PENKA (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Pavel SUK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
PHARMACOLOGY, BASEL, KARGER, 2020, 0031-7012
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30104 Pharmacology and pharmacy
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.547
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115304
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000508853800010
Klíčová slova anglicky
Low molecular weight heparin; Pharmacokinetics; Anti-factor Xa activity; Thromboembolism; Prophylaxis; Vasopressors
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 31. 8. 2020 12:12, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: Critically ill patients are exposed to a high risk of developing thromboembolism. Moreover, standard prophylaxis with subcutaneous (SC) heparin is less efficient in patients requiring vasopressors. The aim is a comparison of pharmacokinetics between SC and intravenous (IV) applied nadroparin. Methods: Thirty-eight ventilated ICU patients requiring vasopressor support were randomized into a single dose of nadroparin 3,800 IU (0.4 mL) subcutaneously (SC group) or 1,900 IU (0.2 mL) intravenously (IV group). Anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) was observed over 24 h; data are stated as median (IQR). Results: Peak anti-Xa was significantly higher in the IV group 0.42 (0.39-0.43) IU/mL than in the SC group 0.16 (0.09-0.18) IU/mL (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards higher area under the curve (AUC) of anti-Xa in the SC group 1.41 (0.41-1.80) IU/mL x h than in the IV group 1.04 (0.93-1.13) IU/mL x h (p = 0.08). In the SC group, there was a negative correlation between anti-Xa AUC and both capillary refill time Xa (r = -0.86) and norepinephrine dose (r = -0.68). In the IV group, anti-Xa decrease half-life was 1.6 (1.4-2.0) h. Conclusions: IV administration of 1,900 IU of nadroparin led to a predictable effective peak anti-Xa. After SC administration, anti-Xa was heterogeneous and significantly influenced by peripheral perfusion.