DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea:
Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications

J 2020

DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications

CHO, Geonho, Igor MALENOVSKÝ, Daniel BURCKHARDT, Hiromitsu INOUE, Seunghwan LEE et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications

Autoři

CHO, Geonho (410 Korejská republika), Igor MALENOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Daniel BURCKHARDT (756 Švýcarsko), Hiromitsu INOUE (392 Japonsko) a Seunghwan LEE (410 Korejská republika)

Vydání

Bulletin of Entomological Research, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020, 0007-4853

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10616 Entomology

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

fulltext

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.750

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/20:00115313

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007485320000012

UT WoS

000544362100011

Klíčová slova anglicky

Cacopsylla; jumping plant lice; molecular diagnostics; pest identification; phytoplasma vectors

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 12. 10. 2020 11:36, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

Pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae: Cacopsylla spp.) belong to the most serious pests of pear (Pyrus spp.). They damage pear trees by excessive removal of phloem sap, by soiling the fruits with honeydew which, in turn, provides a substrate for sooty mould, and by transmission of Candidatus Phytoplasma spp., the causal agents of the pear decline disease. The morphological similarity, the presence of seasonal dimorphism that affects adult colour, size and wing morphology and uncritical use of species names, led to much confusion in the taxonomy of pear psyllids. As a result, pear psyllids have been frequently misidentified. Many of the entries attributed to Cacopsylla pyricola and other species in the GenBank are misidentifications which led to additional, unnecessary confusion. Here we analysed DNA barcodes of 11 pear psyllid species from eastern Asia, Europe and Iran using four mitochondrial gene fragments (COI 658 bp, COI 403 bp, COI-tRNAleu-COII 580 bp and 16S rDNA 452 bp). The efficiency of identification was notably high and considerable barcoding gaps were observed in all markers. Our results confirm the synonymies of the seasonal forms of Cacopsylla jukyungi ( = C. cinereosignata, winter form) and C. maculatili ( = C. qiuzili, summer form) previously suggested based on morphology. Some previous misidentifications (C. chinensis from China, Japan and Korea = misidentification of C. jukyungi; C. pyricola and C. pyrisuga from East Asia = misidentification of C. jukyungi and C. burckhardti, respectively; C. pyricola from Iran = misidentification of C. bidens, C. pyri and Cacopsylla sp.) are also corrected. There is no evidence for the presence of European pear psyllid species in East Asia.

Přiložené soubory

Cho_et_al_2020_DNA_barcoding_of_pear_psyllids.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

CHO, Geonho, Igor MALENOVSKÝ, Daniel BURCKHARDT, Hiromitsu INOUE a Seunghwan LEE. DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications. Bulletin of Entomological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, roč. 110, č. 4, s. 521-534. ISSN 0007-4853. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007485320000012.

@article{1620441,
   author = {Cho, Geonho and Malenovský, Igor and Burckhardt, Daniel and Inoue, Hiromitsu and Lee, Seunghwan},
   article_location = {Cambridge},
   article_number = {4},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007485320000012},
   keywords = {Cacopsylla; jumping plant lice; molecular diagnostics; pest identification; phytoplasma vectors},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0007-4853},
   journal = {Bulletin of Entomological Research},
   title = {DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications},
   url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-entomological-research/article/dna-barcoding-of-pear-psyllids-hemiptera-psylloidea-psyllidae-a-tale-of-continued-misidentifications/F39E7BA40FA165F1FBA1075D81756FFE},
   volume = {110},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1620441
AU  - Cho, Geonho - Malenovský, Igor - Burckhardt, Daniel - Inoue, Hiromitsu - Lee, Seunghwan
PY  - 2020
TI  - DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications
JF  - Bulletin of Entomological Research
VL  - 110
IS  - 4
SP  - 521-534
EP  - 521-534
PB  - Cambridge University Press
SN  - 00074853
KW  - Cacopsylla
KW  - jumping plant lice
KW  - molecular diagnostics
KW  - pest identification
KW  - phytoplasma vectors
UR  - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-entomological-research/article/dna-barcoding-of-pear-psyllids-hemiptera-psylloidea-psyllidae-a-tale-of-continued-misidentifications/F39E7BA40FA165F1FBA1075D81756FFE
L2  - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-entomological-research/article/dna-barcoding-of-pear-psyllids-hemiptera-psylloidea-psyllidae-a-tale-of-continued-misidentifications/F39E7BA40FA165F1FBA1075D81756FFE
N2  - Pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae: Cacopsylla spp.) belong to the most serious pests of pear (Pyrus spp.). They damage pear trees by excessive removal of phloem sap, by soiling the fruits with honeydew which, in turn, provides a substrate for sooty mould, and by transmission of Candidatus Phytoplasma spp., the causal agents of the pear decline disease. The morphological similarity, the presence of seasonal dimorphism that affects adult colour, size and wing morphology and uncritical use of species names, led to much confusion in the taxonomy of pear psyllids. As a result, pear psyllids have been frequently misidentified. Many of the entries attributed to Cacopsylla pyricola and other species in the GenBank are misidentifications which led to additional, unnecessary confusion. Here we analysed DNA barcodes of 11 pear psyllid species from eastern Asia, Europe and Iran using four mitochondrial gene fragments (COI 658 bp, COI 403 bp, COI-tRNAleu-COII 580 bp and 16S rDNA 452 bp). The efficiency of identification was notably high and considerable barcoding gaps were observed in all markers. Our results confirm the synonymies of the seasonal forms of Cacopsylla jukyungi ( = C. cinereosignata, winter form) and C. maculatili ( = C. qiuzili, summer form) previously suggested based on morphology. Some previous misidentifications (C. chinensis from China, Japan and Korea = misidentification of C. jukyungi; C. pyricola and C. pyrisuga from East Asia = misidentification of C. jukyungi and C. burckhardti, respectively; C. pyricola from Iran = misidentification of C. bidens, C. pyri and Cacopsylla sp.) are also corrected. There is no evidence for the presence of European pear psyllid species in East Asia.
ER  -

CHO, Geonho, Igor MALENOVSKÝ, Daniel BURCKHARDT, Hiromitsu INOUE a Seunghwan LEE. DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications. \textit{Bulletin of Entomological Research}. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, roč.~110, č.~4, s.~521-534. ISSN~0007-4853. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007485320000012.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci