Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1627737,
author = {Wagner, Paul M. and Ylä‐Anttila, Tuomas and Gronow, Antti and Ocelík, Petr and Schmidt, Luisa and Delicado, Ana},
article_location = {Hoboken},
article_number = {1},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12484},
keywords = {policy analysis; policy process; climate change; climate policy; advocacy coalition framework; social network analysis; policy networks},
language = {eng},
issn = {0952-1895},
journal = {Governance},
title = {Information exchange networks at the climate science-policy interface : Evidence from theCzech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12484},
volume = {34},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1627737
AU - Wagner, Paul M. - Ylä‐Anttila, Tuomas - Gronow, Antti - Ocelík, Petr - Schmidt, Luisa - Delicado, Ana
PY - 2021
TI - Information exchange networks at the climate science-policy interface : Evidence from theCzech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal
JF - Governance
VL - 34
IS - 1
SP - 211-228
EP - 211-228
PB - Wiley
SN - 09521895
KW - policy analysis
KW - policy process
KW - climate change
KW - climate policy
KW - advocacy coalition framework
KW - social network analysis
KW - policy networks
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12484
N2 - Scientifically informed climate policymaking starts with the exchange of credible, salient, and legitimate scientific information between scientists and policy makers. It is therefore important to understand what explains the exchange of scientific information in national climate policymaking processes. This article applies exponential random graph models to network data from the Czech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal to investigate which types of organizations are favored sources of scientific information and whether actors obtain scientific information from those with similar beliefs as their own. Results show that scientific organizations are favored sources in all countries, while only in the Czech Republic do actors obtain scientific information from those with similar policy beliefs. These findings suggest that actors involved in climate policymaking mostly look to scientific organizations for information, but that in polarized contexts where there is a presence of influential denialists overcoming biased information exchange is a challenge.
ER -
WAGNER, Paul M., Tuomas YLÄ‐ANTTILA, Antti GRONOW, Petr OCELÍK, Luisa SCHMIDT and Ana DELICADO. Information exchange networks at the climate science-policy interface : Evidence from theCzech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal. \textit{Governance}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2021, vol.~34, No~1, p.~211-228. ISSN~0952-1895. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12484.
|
