Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept

J 2020

Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept

LOUIS, Elan D., Martin BAREŠ, Julian BENITO-LEON, Stanley FAHN, Steven J. FRUCHT et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept

Autoři

LOUIS, Elan D. (840 Spojené státy, garant), Martin BAREŠ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Julian BENITO-LEON (724 Španělsko), Stanley FAHN (840 Spojené státy), Steven J. FRUCHT (840 Spojené státy), Joseph JANKOVIC (840 Spojené státy), William G. ONDO (724 Španělsko), Pramod K. PAL (356 Indie) a Eng-King TAN (702 Singapur)

Vydání

Lancet Neurology, London, UK, Elsevier, 2020, 1474-4422

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30210 Clinical neurology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 44.182

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115427

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9

UT WoS

000514832700023

Klíčová slova anglicky

CONSENSUS STATEMENT; HEAD TREMOR; DISORDER; DYSTONIA; PREVALENCE; DEMENTIA; NETWORK; DECLINE; DISEASE

Štítky

14110127, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 19. 3. 2020 13:50, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

In addition to redefining essential tremor (ET), the 2018 consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor coined a new term: essential tremor-plus (ET-plus). This term is uncertainly defined as tremor with the characteristics of ET, with additional neurological signs of uncertain clinical significance. If ET-plus had been defined on the basis of a difference in underlying pathology or an appreciable difference in prognosis, it would have a valid, scientific rationale, as does the term Parkinson-plus. However, there is no such evidence, so the basis for the term is questionable. In fact, ET-plus might only represent a state condition (ie, patients with ET might develop these additional clinical features when the disease is at a more advanced stage). We caution against coining new terms that are not supported by a firm scientific basis and encourage research into the creation of essential tremor subsets that are defined with respect to differences in underlying causes or pathophysiology.

Citovat

LOUIS, Elan D., Martin BAREŠ, Julian BENITO-LEON, Stanley FAHN, Steven J. FRUCHT, Joseph JANKOVIC, William G. ONDO, Pramod K. PAL a Eng-King TAN. Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept. Lancet Neurology. London, UK: Elsevier, 2020, roč. 19, č. 3, s. 266-270. ISSN 1474-4422. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9.

@article{1637476,
   author = {Louis, Elan D. and Bareš, Martin and BenitoandLeon, Julian and Fahn, Stanley and Frucht, Steven J. and Jankovic, Joseph and Ondo, William G. and Pal, Pramod K. and Tan, EngandKing},
   article_location = {London, UK},
   article_number = {3},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9},
   keywords = {CONSENSUS STATEMENT; HEAD TREMOR; DISORDER; DYSTONIA; PREVALENCE; DEMENTIA; NETWORK; DECLINE; DISEASE},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1474-4422},
   journal = {Lancet Neurology},
   title = {Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9},
   volume = {19},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1637476
AU  - Louis, Elan D. - Bareš, Martin - Benito-Leon, Julian - Fahn, Stanley - Frucht, Steven J. - Jankovic, Joseph - Ondo, William G. - Pal, Pramod K. - Tan, Eng-King
PY  - 2020
TI  - Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept
JF  - Lancet Neurology
VL  - 19
IS  - 3
SP  - 266-270
EP  - 266-270
PB  - Elsevier
SN  - 14744422
KW  - CONSENSUS STATEMENT
KW  - HEAD TREMOR
KW  - DISORDER
KW  - DYSTONIA
KW  - PREVALENCE
KW  - DEMENTIA
KW  - NETWORK
KW  - DECLINE
KW  - DISEASE
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9
L2  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9
N2  - In addition to redefining essential tremor (ET), the 2018 consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor coined a new term: essential tremor-plus (ET-plus). This term is uncertainly defined as tremor with the characteristics of ET, with additional neurological signs of uncertain clinical significance. If ET-plus had been defined on the basis of a difference in underlying pathology or an appreciable difference in prognosis, it would have a valid, scientific rationale, as does the term Parkinson-plus. However, there is no such evidence, so the basis for the term is questionable. In fact, ET-plus might only represent a state condition (ie, patients with ET might develop these additional clinical features when the disease is at a more advanced stage). We caution against coining new terms that are not supported by a firm scientific basis and encourage research into the creation of essential tremor subsets that are defined with respect to differences in underlying causes or pathophysiology.
ER  -

LOUIS, Elan D., Martin BAREŠ, Julian BENITO-LEON, Stanley FAHN, Steven J. FRUCHT, Joseph JANKOVIC, William G. ONDO, Pramod K. PAL a Eng-King TAN. Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept. \textit{Lancet Neurology}. London, UK: Elsevier, 2020, roč.~19, č.~3, s.~266-270. ISSN~1474-4422. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci