2019
Cell-based data to predict the toxicity of chemicals to fish. Commentary on the manuscript by Rodrigues et al., 2019. Cell-based assays seem not to accurately predict fish short-term toxicity of pesticides. Environmental Pollution 252:476-482
SCHIRMER, K., J. STADNICKA-MICHALAK, S.E. BELANGER, Luděk BLÁHA, N.C. BOLS et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Cell-based data to predict the toxicity of chemicals to fish. Commentary on the manuscript by Rodrigues et al., 2019. Cell-based assays seem not to accurately predict fish short-term toxicity of pesticides. Environmental Pollution 252:476-482
Autoři
SCHIRMER, K. (garant), J. STADNICKA-MICHALAK, S.E. BELANGER, Luděk BLÁHA (203 Česká republika, domácí), N.C. BOLS, S.D. DYER, M.R. EMBRY, M. FISCHER, M. HAIDER, J. HERMENS, M.T. HULTMAN, N. KRAMER, H. LAUE, L.E.J. LEE, A. LILLICRAP, A. NATSCH, H. SEGNER, K. TANNEBERGER, K.E. TOLLEFSEN, I. WERNER, H. WITTERS a A. ZUPANIC
Vydání
Environmental Pollution, OXFORD, OXON, ENGLAND, ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2019, 0269-7491
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 6.793
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/19:00113452
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
000488887600076
Klíčová slova anglicky
Metabolic activation
Štítky
Změněno: 1. 4. 2020 12:25, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
We would like to express strong concerns about the publication by Rodrigues et al., entitled: “Cell-based assays seem not to accurately predict fish short-term toxicity of pesticides”, which was recently published in “Environmental Pollution” (2019, 252, pages 476–482, accepted May 07/2019, available online May 27/2019). The topic of the paper is of great interest to the toxicology community because it addresses the need to define alternatives to animals in chemical risk assessment. The authors collected a large amount of in vitro data on chemical testing and added some of their own – the entire data set being predominantly focused on mammalian cell systems - and then attempted a comparison with data for the same chemicals regarding their toxicity to fish. Unfortunately, the work presented is flawed in several ways, sending an undifferentiated, if not wrong, message. Because we fear that this publication can cause unjustified damage to the achievements already made and to the ongoing efforts of the growing community in academia, industry and regulation to further alternatives to animal testing, we wish to openly discuss our concerns.