JANDOVÁ, Monika, Zdeněk TOMEŠ a Christopher Alfred NASH. High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES. DE GRUYTER OPEN LTD, BOGUMILA ZUGA 32A ST, 01-811 WARSAW, POLAND, 2016, roč. 16, č. 3, s. 269-275. ISSN 1213-2446. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2016-0016.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report
Autoři JANDOVÁ, Monika (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zdeněk TOMEŠ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Christopher Alfred NASH (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko).
Vydání REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, DE GRUYTER OPEN LTD, BOGUMILA ZUGA 32A ST, 01-811 WARSAW, POLAND, 2016, 1213-2446.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 50202 Applied Economics, Econometrics
Stát vydavatele Polsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14560/16:00113834
Organizační jednotka Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2016-0016
UT WoS 000406945000006
Klíčová slova anglicky Central and Eastern Europe; demand forecast; ex-ante evaluations; economic geography; high-speed rail
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Daniela Marcollová, učo 111148. Změněno: 11. 5. 2020 10:21.
Anotace
The European transport strategy promotes the role of railways and expects that the key role in passenger transport should be played by high-speed rail (HSR). Although the core network of high-speed lines has already been built and is operating in Western Europe, there has been little coverage so far in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The aim of the conference " High-Speed Rail for CEE Countries" that took place in Prague in June 2016 was to put together academics, policy-makers, and practitioners interested in HSR and to formulate recommendations for CEE countries based on West European countries' experience. Based on the conference presentations and subsequent discussion, the following conclusions were formulated. Firstly, there are many crucial differences in national HSR build-up and operation, which means that former experience of Western Europe is not directly applicable to CEE countries. Secondly, in comparing presentations discussing experiences in France, Britain, Italy, and Germany, it was concluded that the German approach-upgrading existing lines where possible and only building new lines for bottleneck sections-was the most likely appropriate solution in CEE. Lastly, CEE has the additional problem of many border crossings, with a reduction of traffic in comparison with purely domestic routes, and this effect has to be taken into account.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 26. 4. 2024 06:40