J 2016

High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report

JANDOVÁ, Monika, Zdeněk TOMEŠ and Christopher Alfred NASH

Basic information

Original name

High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report

Authors

JANDOVÁ, Monika (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Zdeněk TOMEŠ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Christopher Alfred NASH (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

Edition

REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, DE GRUYTER OPEN LTD, BOGUMILA ZUGA 32A ST, 01-811 WARSAW, POLAND, 2016, 1213-2446

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

50202 Applied Economics, Econometrics

Country of publisher

Poland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14560/16:00113834

Organization unit

Faculty of Economics and Administration

UT WoS

000406945000006

Keywords in English

Central and Eastern Europe; demand forecast; ex-ante evaluations; economic geography; high-speed rail
Změněno: 11/5/2020 10:21, Mgr. Daniela Marcollová

Abstract

V originále

The European transport strategy promotes the role of railways and expects that the key role in passenger transport should be played by high-speed rail (HSR). Although the core network of high-speed lines has already been built and is operating in Western Europe, there has been little coverage so far in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The aim of the conference " High-Speed Rail for CEE Countries" that took place in Prague in June 2016 was to put together academics, policy-makers, and practitioners interested in HSR and to formulate recommendations for CEE countries based on West European countries' experience. Based on the conference presentations and subsequent discussion, the following conclusions were formulated. Firstly, there are many crucial differences in national HSR build-up and operation, which means that former experience of Western Europe is not directly applicable to CEE countries. Secondly, in comparing presentations discussing experiences in France, Britain, Italy, and Germany, it was concluded that the German approach-upgrading existing lines where possible and only building new lines for bottleneck sections-was the most likely appropriate solution in CEE. Lastly, CEE has the additional problem of many border crossings, with a reduction of traffic in comparison with purely domestic routes, and this effect has to be taken into account.