2019
Nested plant LTR retrotransposons target specific regions of other elements, while all LTR retrotransposons often target palindromes and nucleosome-occupied regions: in silico study
JEDLIČKA, Pavel, Matej LEXA, Ivan VANÁT, Eduard KEJNOVSKÝ, Roman HOBZA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Nested plant LTR retrotransposons target specific regions of other elements, while all LTR retrotransposons often target palindromes and nucleosome-occupied regions: in silico study
Autoři
JEDLIČKA, Pavel (203 Česká republika, garant), Matej LEXA (703 Slovensko, domácí), Ivan VANÁT (703 Slovensko, domácí), Eduard KEJNOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika) a Roman HOBZA (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Mobile DNA, 2019, 1759-8753
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10611 Plant sciences, botany
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.161
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14330/19:00114128
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta informatiky
UT WoS
000502731200001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Transposable elements; LTR retrotransposons; Nesting; Chromatin; Nucleosomes; Plants
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 6. 5. 2020 17:12, RNDr. Pavel Šmerk, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Background:Nesting is common in LTR retrotransposons, especially in large genomes containing a high number of elements.Results:We analyzed 12 plant genomes and obtained 1491 pairs of nested and original (pre-existing) LTR retrotransposons. We systematically analyzed mutual nesting of individual LTR retrotransposons and found that certain families, more often belonging to the Ty3/gypsy than Ty1/copia superfamilies, showed a higher nesting frequency as well as a higher preference for older copies of the same family (“autoinsertions”). Nested LTR retrotransposons were preferentially located in the 3’UTR of other LTR retrotransposons, while coding and regulatory regions (LTRs) are not commonly targeted. Insertions displayed a weak preference for palindromes and were associated with a strong positional pattern of higher predicted nucleosome occupancy. Deviation from randomness in target site choice was also found in 13,983 non-nested plant LTR retrotransposons.Conclusions:We reveal that nesting of LTR retrotransposons is not random. Integration is correlated with sequence composition, secondary structure and the chromatin environment. Insertion into retrotransposon positions with allow negative impact on family fitness supports the concept of the genome being viewed as an ecosystem of various elements.
Návaznosti
GA18-00258S, projekt VaV |
|