J 2020

Values Education in Outdoor Environmental Education Programs from the Perspective of Practitioners

ČINČERA, Jan; Bruce JOHNSON; Roman KROUFEK a Petra ŠIMONOVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Values Education in Outdoor Environmental Education Programs from the Perspective of Practitioners

Autoři

ČINČERA, Jan ORCID; Bruce JOHNSON; Roman KROUFEK a Petra ŠIMONOVÁ

Vydání

Sustainability, Basel, MDPI, 2020, 2071-1050

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50300 5.3 Education

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.251

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/20:00114169

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

values; environmental education; outdoor programs; qualitative

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 3. 2021 10:10, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

Shaping environmental values is considered one of the goals of environmental education. At the same time, this creates questions about the line between indoctrination and education. While values education has been widely discussed from various theoretical perspectives, few studies have analyzed how it is being practiced. This article investigates five outdoor environmental education programs and identifies the values the programs promote as well as the means they use to communicate these values to students. Additionally, the article examines the perspectives of 17 program leaders and center directors regarding the ways in which values should be promoted in environmental education and the approaches they use in their practice. According to the findings, all the observed programs applied a normative, value-laden approach, communicating mainly the values of universalism. The most frequently observed strategy was the inculcation of desirable values by moralizing and modeling. Simultaneously, some of the leaders’ beliefs, while highlighting value-free or pluralistic approaches, contradicted their rather normative practice. This article describes the theory–practice gap identified and discusses the implications of the prevailing use of the normative approach in outdoor environmental education for the field. It calls for opening an in-depth debate on what, why, and how values belong in outdoor environmental education practice.

Návaznosti

GA18-15374S, projekt VaV
Název: Posilování změn hodnot a chování prostřednictvím environmentální výchovy v přírodě (Akronym: RWL)
Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Promoting Behavioral and Value Change through Outdoor Environmental Education

Přiložené soubory