2020
Values Education in Outdoor Environmental Education Programs from the Perspective of Practitioners
ČINČERA, Jan; Bruce JOHNSON; Roman KROUFEK a Petra ŠIMONOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Values Education in Outdoor Environmental Education Programs from the Perspective of Practitioners
Autoři
ČINČERA, Jan ORCID; Bruce JOHNSON; Roman KROUFEK a Petra ŠIMONOVÁ
Vydání
Sustainability, Basel, MDPI, 2020, 2071-1050
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50300 5.3 Education
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.251
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/20:00114169
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
values; environmental education; outdoor programs; qualitative
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 3. 2021 10:10, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
Anotace
V originále
Shaping environmental values is considered one of the goals of environmental education. At the same time, this creates questions about the line between indoctrination and education. While values education has been widely discussed from various theoretical perspectives, few studies have analyzed how it is being practiced. This article investigates five outdoor environmental education programs and identifies the values the programs promote as well as the means they use to communicate these values to students. Additionally, the article examines the perspectives of 17 program leaders and center directors regarding the ways in which values should be promoted in environmental education and the approaches they use in their practice. According to the findings, all the observed programs applied a normative, value-laden approach, communicating mainly the values of universalism. The most frequently observed strategy was the inculcation of desirable values by moralizing and modeling. Simultaneously, some of the leaders’ beliefs, while highlighting value-free or pluralistic approaches, contradicted their rather normative practice. This article describes the theory–practice gap identified and discusses the implications of the prevailing use of the normative approach in outdoor environmental education for the field. It calls for opening an in-depth debate on what, why, and how values belong in outdoor environmental education practice.
Návaznosti
| GA18-15374S, projekt VaV |
|