GENSICKE, H., J. W. EVANS, F. S. AL AJLAN, D. DOWLATSHAHI, M. NAJM, A. L. CALLEJA, J. PUIG, S .L. SOHN, S. H. AHN, A. Y. POPPE, Robert MIKULÍK, N. ASDAGHI, T. S. FIELD, A. JIN, T. ASIL, J. M. BOULANGER, M. D. HILL, M. GOYAL, A. M. DEMCHUK a B. K. MENON. Comparison of different methods of thrombus permeability measurement and impact on recanalization in the INTERRSeCT multinational multicenter prospective cohort study. NEURORADIOLOGY. NEW YORK: SPRINGER, 2020, roč. 62, č. 3, s. 301-306. ISSN 0028-3940. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02320-y.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Comparison of different methods of thrombus permeability measurement and impact on recanalization in the INTERRSeCT multinational multicenter prospective cohort study
Autoři GENSICKE, H. (124 Kanada, garant), J. W. EVANS (124 Kanada), F. S. AL AJLAN (124 Kanada), D. DOWLATSHAHI (124 Kanada), M. NAJM (124 Kanada), A. L. CALLEJA (724 Španělsko), J. PUIG (724 Španělsko), S .L. SOHN (410 Korejská republika), S. H. AHN (410 Korejská republika), A. Y. POPPE (124 Kanada), Robert MIKULÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), N. ASDAGHI (840 Spojené státy), T. S. FIELD (124 Kanada), A. JIN (124 Kanada), T. ASIL (792 Turecko), J. M. BOULANGER (124 Kanada), M. D. HILL (124 Kanada), M. GOYAL (124 Kanada), A. M. DEMCHUK (124 Kanada) a B. K. MENON (124 Kanada).
Vydání NEURORADIOLOGY, NEW YORK, SPRINGER, 2020, 0028-3940.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30103 Neurosciences
Stát vydavatele Spojené státy
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 2.804
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115996
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02320-y
UT WoS 000495942400003
Klíčová slova anglicky Acute ischemic stroke; Thrombus permeability; Recanalization therapies; NCCT; CTA
Štítky 14110127, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Změněno: 31. 8. 2020 12:13.
Anotace
Purpose To compare the association of different measures of intracranial thrombus permeability on non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) with recanalization with or without intravenous alteplase. Methods Patients with anterior circulation occlusion from the INTERRSeCT study were included. Thrombus permeability was measured on non-contrast CT and CTA using the following methods: [1] automated method, mean attenuation increase on co-registered thin (< 2.5 mm) CTA/NCCT; [2] semi-automated method, maximum attenuation increase on non-registered CTA/NCCT (Delta HUmax); [3] manual method, maximum attenuation on CTA (HUmax); and [4] visual method, residual flow grade. Primary outcome was recanalization with intravenous alteplase on the revised AOL scale (2b/3). Regression models were compared using C-statistic, Akaike (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Results Four hundred eighty patients were included in this analysis. Statistical models using methods 2, 3, and 4 were similar in their ability to discriminate recanalizers from non-recanalizers (C-statistic 0.667, 0.683, and 0.634, respectively); method 3 had the least information loss (AIC = 483.8; BIC = 492.2). A HUmax >= 89 measured with method 3 provided optimal sensitivity and specificity in discriminating recanalizers from non-recanalizers [recanalization 55.4% (95%CI 46.2-64.6) when HUmax > 89 vs. 16.8% (95%CI 13.0-20.6) when HUmax <= 89]. In sensitivity analyses restricted to patients with co-registered CTA/NCCT (n = 88), methods 1-4 predicted recanalization similarly (C-statistic 0.641, 0.688, 0.640, 0.648, respectively) with Method 2 having the least information loss (AIC 104.8, BIC 109.8). Conclusion Simple methods that measure thrombus permeability are as reliable as complex image processing methods in discriminating recanalizers from non-recanalizers.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 24. 6. 2024 03:37