J 2021

Meniscus transplantation-prospective assessment of clinical results in two, five and ten year follow-up

PAŠA, Libor, Ján KUŽMA, Radim HERŮFEK, Josef PROKEŠ, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Meniscus transplantation-prospective assessment of clinical results in two, five and ten year follow-up

Autoři

PAŠA, Libor (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Ján KUŽMA (703 Slovensko, domácí), Radim HERŮFEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Josef PROKEŠ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Vojtech HAVLAS (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, NEW YORK, SPRINGER, 2021, 0341-2695

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30211 Orthopaedics

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.479

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/21:00120659

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000541410500002

Klíčová slova anglicky

Meniscus; Transplantation; Functional outcome; 10 years follow-up; Arthroscopy

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 5. 2021 09:09, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Purpose The authors present clinical results in patients following transplantation of deep-frozen menisci within ten years following the surgery. Methods A cohort of 46 patients who were transplanted altogether 49 menisci was subject to prospective study following six months, two, five and ten years after meniscus transplantation. For subjective assessment, we used KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scores; objective assessment was based on load X-ray examination of the operated knee at two, five and ten years after the surgery, MRI examination of 34 patients in the interval of two and ten years after the operation, control arthroscopy was performed in 23 patients eight of whom suffered a new injury. Results All 38 patients who have completed ten year follow-up without any new injury of the operated joint demonstrated statistically significant improvement of mobility in the period of six months and two, five and ten years following the meniscal transplantation. Further follow-up demonstrated different results in patients with a new injury and without a new injury of the operated knee joint. In eight patients (17.3%), the follow-up was disturbed by a new injury of the operated joint within three to eight years after the meniscal transplantation. In three patients with the damaged meniscal transplant, a cartilage deterioration from degree II to degree IIIa was found. In second-look arthroscopy, the patients with no injury showed signs of the improved condition of cartilage by one degree according to ICRS classification on average. The MRI imaging showed relatively frequent (47%) extrusion of the anterior and medial part of meniscus (2.5-3.8 mms) without the followed-up dynamics of changes at two and ten years after the surgery. Conclusion All patients in the selected cohort proved the positive benefit of meniscus transplant when it comes to the improvement of clinical symptoms and improvement of mobility of the operated knee joint. The higher mobility following the transplantation compared to the activity prior to the surgery could have contributed to a new injury of the operated joint in 17% of the patients in the cohort.