2020
Vitamin D levels in IBD: a randomised trial of weight-based versus fixed dose vitamin D supplementation
KOJECKÝ, Vladimír, Jan MATOUS, Bohuslav KIANIČKA, Petr DITE, Zdena ZADOROVA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Vitamin D levels in IBD: a randomised trial of weight-based versus fixed dose vitamin D supplementation
Autoři
KOJECKÝ, Vladimír (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan MATOUS (203 Česká republika), Bohuslav KIANIČKA (203 Česká republika, garant), Petr DITE (203 Česká republika), Zdena ZADOROVA (203 Česká republika), Jan KUBOVY (203 Česká republika), Martina HLOSTOVA (203 Česká republika) a Michal UHER (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, ABINGDON, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2020, 0036-5521
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30219 Gastroenterology and hepatology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.423
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00116133
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000545392100001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Inflammatory bowel disease; vitamin D deficiency; vitamin D intake; dietary supplements; body weight
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 31. 8. 2020 10:43, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Objectives:Body weight is one of the factors affecting blood levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD). The aim of this study was to establish whether a vitamin D (vitD) weight-based dosing is more appropriate to a fixed daily dose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Materials/methods:This was an open label randomised trial. Patients with IBD were assigned to receive oral cholecalciferol at a dose of 28 IU/kg (IU/kg) or 2000 IU per day (IU/day) for 12 weeks during winter months. 25OHD plasma levels and other biochemical parameters were measured at baseline and after supplementation period. The primary outcome measure was 25OHD level after a follow-up period. Results:A total of 173 patients were analysed. The mean BMI was 25.5 +/- 5.1 and initial mean 25OHD level was 62.7 +/- 25.5 nmol/l. A similar increase (9.7 +/- 26.9 vs 9.8 +/- 26.7 nmol/l) in 25OHD levels occurred both in IU/kg and IU/day group. The proportion of subjects with normal and sub-normal levels following the substitution was comparable irrespective of body weight. The change in 25OHD level correlated positively only with the dose of vitD (p < .001) and negatively with the baseline 25OHD level (p < .001). A sustained 25OHD level of 75 nmol/l corresponds with a calculated daily vitD dose of 2034 IU. Conclusions:Weight-based dosing of vitamin D is not superior to a fixed dose in order to maintain stable 25OHD levels in IBD patients. Cholecalciferol dose of 2,000 IU/day is safe and sufficient during winter period.