2021
Non-repudiable provenance for clinical decision support systems
FAIRWEATHER, Elliot, Rudolf WITTNER, Martin CHAPMAN, Petr HOLUB, Vasa CURCIN et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Non-repudiable provenance for clinical decision support systems
Autoři
FAIRWEATHER, Elliot, Rudolf WITTNER (703 Slovensko, domácí), Martin CHAPMAN, Petr HOLUB (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Vasa CURCIN
Vydání
Cham, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, od s. 165-182, 18 s. 2021
Nakladatel
Springer
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
10201 Computer sciences, information science, bioinformatics
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 0.402 v roce 2005
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14330/21:00120672
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta informatiky
ISBN
978-3-030-80959-1
ISSN
Klíčová slova anglicky
data provenance;non-repudiation;health informatics;decision support systems
Štítky
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 23. 5. 2022 14:17, RNDr. Pavel Šmerk, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Provenance templates are now a recognised methodology for the construction of data provenance records. Each template defines the provenance of a domain-specific action in abstract form, which may then be instantiated as required by a single call to the provenance template service. As data reliability and trustworthiness becomes a critical issue in an increasing number of domains, there is a corresponding need to ensure that the provenance of that data is non-repudiable. In this paper we contribute two new, complementary modules to our template model and implementation to produce non-repudiable data provenance. The first, a module that traces the operation of the provenance template service itself, and records a provenance trace of the construction of an object-level document, at the level of individual service calls. The second, a non-repudiation module that generates evidence for the data recorded about each call, annotates the service trace accordingly, and submits a representation of that evidence to a provider-agnostic notary service. We evaluate the applicability of our approach in the context of a clinical decision support system. We first define a policy to ensure the non-repudiation of evidence with respect to a security threat analysis in order to demonstrate the suitability of our solution. We then select three use cases from within a particular system, Consult, with contrasting data provenance recording requirements and analyse the subsequent performance of our prototype implementation against three different notary providers.