RUSINKO, Marcela. Nationalization of Auction Business in Czechoslovakia : State Interests, Monopoly Art Market and Legislation. In Legislation, legal structures, and their impact on the art market : Researching art market practices from past to present / Workshop 5, international conference Ljubljana, 7-8 September, 2020. 2020.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Nationalization of Auction Business in Czechoslovakia : State Interests, Monopoly Art Market and Legislation
Authors RUSINKO, Marcela (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Legislation, legal structures, and their impact on the art market : Researching art market practices from past to present / Workshop 5, international conference Ljubljana, 7-8 September, 2020, 2020.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Requested lectures
Field of Study 60401 Arts, Art history
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/20:00114303
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
Keywords in English Nationalization; Confiscation; Auction Market; Czechoslovakia; Czech Lands; Prague; Monopoly Market; Legislation
Tags rivok
Tags International impact
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Zuzana Matulíková, učo 405304. Changed: 9/4/2021 13:36.
Abstract
The political situation after the 1939-45 war as well as Yalta conference in distinctly left-oriented Central Europe led not only to rapid expulsion of hostile, i.e. German/Hungarian-speaking population, but also to extensive displacements of artistic assets of former social elites. During the first post-war decade, the developed art market in Czechoslovakia; primarily in its auction form, faced an unprecedented boom related to the wave of antiquities coming from the former residences of nobility and bourgeoisie. Even if the relevant legislation sought to preserve especially valuable movable assets in public collections and set up a National Cultural Commission for this purpose, the disputes among the interests of the various state ministries still incited both legal and illegal flows of art assets through domestic market. In contrast to efforts to preserve “state cultural assets” for public purposes, the economic – or rather the foreign exchange – interests of the state underwent a structural economic crisis at that time stood. The large set of antiquities, art industrial objects, carpets, antique furniture, as a rule with no provenance indications given, were sold at significantly reduced prices, often heading to foreign market. As a potential “helpful” measure the communist state initiated the immediate nationalization of private auction businesses during the summer of 1949. Nevertheless, even this monopoly business network controlled by official authorities failed to prevent large-scale leaks of valuable property to the hands of speculators. But it certainly succeeded in implementing the new ideological criteria and setting the new regulations for both market participants and goods offered. Actually, the situation changed in the moment, when the market with nationalized property has exhausted in terms of both supply and demand. The paper intends to examine the discrepancies among legislation efforts and practical functioning of the market, both in its free and then monopoly directed forms, during the critical period of early post-war years in Central Europe. It also seeks for potential consequences for contemporary market; it asks after connections among historical and contemporary behaviour of its participants, regardless of legislation.
Links
GA20-09541S, research and development projectName: Dějiny umění na Moravě: Morava v dějinách umění (Acronym: Dějiny umění na Moravě)
Investor: Czech Science Foundation
PrintDisplayed: 28/5/2024 23:16